Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 225666
Merge Review: crypto-utils
Last modified: 2013-02-07 11:36:32 EST
Fedora Merge Review: crypto-utils http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/crypto-utils/ Initial Owner: jorton@redhat.com
It would be nice to see this in EPEL EL-5. Not sure why this isn't in RHEL5, since it appears to be in RHEL4.
Needs perl-Newt to be in EL-5.
It is scheduled to be restored to RHEL 5 by 5.1, FWIW.
There is no upstream url, so where is this package located?
There is no upstream.
Good: - rpmlint checks return: You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. Fix. crypto-utils.spec:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" INSTALLDIRS=vendor $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it may break short circuit builds. Fix. crypto-utils.spec:377: W: macro-in-%changelog %files Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. crypto-utils.spec:378: W: macro-in-%changelog %post Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Trival to fix. crypto-utils.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: crypto-rand-1.3.tar.gz The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. crypto-utils.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. I see this has no real upstream, if this is something we originate it needs a home on fedorahosted. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission copying 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission pemutil.c 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission certext.c 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission secutil.h 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission keyutil.c 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission SECerrs.h 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission keyutil.h 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. crypto-utils.src: W: strange-permission secutil.c 0775L A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Easy fixes. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( ) OK, text in %doc, matches source Says MIT and GPLv2+, should be MIT and GPLv2+ and MPLv1.0 - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream Impossible to determine. - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file I realize this package is ancient, but at least the few fixes are easy. Let me know if you want me to commit anything.
Ping? I'll commit and close if that's ok?
Committed fixes and built in rawhide, APPROVED, closing.