Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 225762 - Merge Review: fonts-hebrew
Merge Review: fonts-hebrew
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Parag AN(पराग)
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-01-31 13:39 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-08-16 01:52:42 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
panemade: fedora‑review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Modified SPEC file (1.68 KB, patch)
2007-02-27 07:35 EST, Parag AN(पराग)
no flags Details | Diff
rpmlint silent SPEC file (2.10 KB, text/x-rpm-spec)
2007-07-27 01:42 EDT, Parag AN(पराग)
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 13:39:09 EST
Fedora Merge Review: fonts-hebrew

Initial Owner: majain@redhat.com
Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-02-27 07:35:30 EST
Created attachment 148860 [details]
Modified SPEC file

Had a look at SPEC. Its written using old packaging guidelines.I have created a
patch for you. Use this patch and generate a new release.
Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-04-10 06:17:23 EDT
looks this package is orphaned ???
Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-07-27 01:42:48 EDT
Created attachment 160098 [details]
rpmlint silent SPEC file

update cvs with this SPEC and build new package
Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-07-27 06:02:25 EDT
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
6c018eb1b1ce33db8b0fdf64cb09182c  culmus-0.100.tar.gz
fdce7a1e5844bdf133c752a722220cf5  LICENSE-BITSTREAM
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ fonts scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI App.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.