Bug 225818 - Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
Summary: Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 18:51 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2010-10-05 04:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-10-05 04:32:47 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
panemade: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
spec cleanup (2.92 KB, patch)
2010-09-29 07:14 UTC, Parag AN(पराग)
no flags Details | Diff

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 18:51:18 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: gnome-icon-theme

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/gnome-icon-theme/
Initial Owner: davidz@redhat.com

Comment 1 Jeff Garzik 2010-07-08 04:08:52 UTC
merged long ago, closing.

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-07-08 04:56:14 UTC
This is package review. So please provide your package review here and if you are not current owner for this then you can accept this package by setting fedora-review+ flag and then close it.

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-07-08 04:56:52 UTC
Are you aware of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ?

Comment 4 Jeff Garzik 2010-07-08 05:05:47 UTC
Keeping useless bugzillas like this open crowds out valid package reviews that need to get done.  This package has been merged for quite some time.  If you actually have a REAL issue, it can be filed as a new bug.

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2010-07-08 20:53:13 UTC
If you're having problems finding a reviewer to get something of yours reviewed (which certainly appears to be the motivation here), there are procedures for that. Unilaterally deciding to terminate an existing process that you've not had any involvement in before without discussing it anywhere else isn't the way to do so.

Maybe we will eventually drop these. But that's not a decision one random packager gets to make.

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-09-29 07:14:06 UTC
Created attachment 450383 [details]
spec cleanup

This will fix this package and clean it as per guidelines.

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2010-10-05 04:32:47 UTC
Applied in gnome-icon-theme-2.31.0-2.fc15

APPROVED


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.