Bug 2258867 - Review Request: opentofu - OpenTofu lets you declaratively manage your cloud infrastructure
Summary: Review Request: opentofu - OpenTofu lets you declaratively manage your cloud ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-01-17 19:05 UTC by Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
Modified: 2024-02-05 20:29 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-02-05 20:29:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6913321 to 6987105 (1.03 KB, patch)
2024-02-05 18:19 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-01-17 19:05:40 UTC
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/opentofu.spec
SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/opentofu-1.6.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: OpenTofu lets you declaratively manage your cloud infrastructure.
Fedora Account System Username: mikelo2

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-01-17 19:45:12 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6913321
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2258867-opentofu/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06913321-opentofu/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- License file operator_license.go is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Documentation size is 1757358 bytes in 84 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2024-01-19 15:23:38 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2024-02-02 16:23:12 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines
* Package builds and installs
* Package licensing is not quite correctly handled
* No serious issues from rpmlint

The only issue I see missing is that since you're bundling for now (as we discussed in person, you want to do the devendoring later), you'll need to document all the license tags for all the bundled components in the License field.

See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/

Comment 4 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-02-05 17:40:02 UTC
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/opentofu.spec
SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/opentofu-1.6.1-1.fc39.src.rpm

- Updated to 1.6.1
- Added license tags for all components, checked with licensei

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-05 18:19:31 UTC
Created attachment 2015226 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6913321 to 6987105

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-05 18:19:33 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6987105
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2258867-opentofu/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06987105-opentofu/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- License file operator_license.go is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Documentation size is 1758902 bytes in 84 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Neal Gompa 2024-02-05 19:34:16 UTC
This looks good to me now.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-02-05 19:49:16 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opentofu

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2024-02-05 20:20:23 UTC
FEDORA-2024-447f7abe5d (opentofu-1.6.1-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-447f7abe5d

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2024-02-05 20:29:32 UTC
FEDORA-2024-447f7abe5d (opentofu-1.6.1-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.