Bug 2259274 - Review Request: golang-github-stoicperlman-fls - Go File Line Seeker
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stoicperlman-fls - Go File Line Seeker
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2259282
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-01-19 21:45 UTC by Arthur Bols
Modified: 2024-07-27 14:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-07-27 14:08:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6923263 to 7132016 (823 bytes, patch)
2024-03-10 18:57 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Arthur Bols 2024-01-19 21:45:56 UTC
Spec URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-stoicperlman-fls.spec
SRPM URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-stoicperlman-fls-0-0.1.20240118gitf073b7a.fc39.src.rpm
Description: Go File Line Seeker.
Fedora Account System Username: principis

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-01-19 21:50:47 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6923263
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259274-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06923263-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-10 18:57:52 UTC
Created attachment 2021000 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6923263 to 7132016

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-10 18:57:55 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7132016
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259274-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07132016-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-04-13 12:23:33 UTC
Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [-] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [-] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance

Thanks!

Comment 6 Arthur Bols 2024-07-27 14:08:15 UTC
Sorry for missing the review and thanks for the effort. I'm abandoning this for now.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.