Bug 2259274 - Review Request: golang-github-stoicperlman-fls - Go File Line Seeker
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stoicperlman-fls - Go File Line Seeker
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2259282
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-01-19 21:45 UTC by Arthur Bols
Modified: 2024-04-13 12:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6923263 to 7132016 (823 bytes, patch)
2024-03-10 18:57 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Arthur Bols 2024-01-19 21:45:56 UTC
Spec URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-stoicperlman-fls.spec
SRPM URL: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-stoicperlman-fls-0-0.1.20240118gitf073b7a.fc39.src.rpm
Description: Go File Line Seeker.
Fedora Account System Username: principis

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-01-19 21:50:47 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6923263
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259274-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06923263-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-10 18:57:52 UTC
Created attachment 2021000 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6923263 to 7132016

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-10 18:57:55 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7132016
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259274-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07132016-golang-github-stoicperlman-fls/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2024-04-13 12:23:33 UTC
Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [-] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [-] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance

Thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.