Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/rust-crypto_secretbox.spec SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/rust-crypto_secretbox-0.1.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Description: Pure Rust implementation of the XSalsa20Poly1305 (a.k.a. NaCl crypto_secretbox) authenticated encryption cipher as well as the libsodium variant of XChaCha20Poly1305. Fedora Account System Username: mikelo2
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6926739 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259330-rust-crypto_secretbox/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06926739-rust-crypto_secretbox/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Looks like the heuristics for getting a good Summary from the crate description failed here - can you update it please? Maybe something like "Implementation of the XSalsa20Poly1305 and XChaCha20Poly1305 ciphers".
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/rust-crypto_secretbox.spec SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/rust-crypto_secretbox-0.1.1-1.fc39.src.rpm Changed summary with your proposal
Created attachment 2010570 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 6926739 to 6952766
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6952766 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2259330-rust-crypto_secretbox/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06952766-rust-crypto_secretbox/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Thanks! Package looks good in general, but there's a missing optional dependency: Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides (crate(chacha20/default) >= 0.9.0 with crate(chacha20/default) < 0.10.0~) needed by rust-crypto_secretbox+chacha20-devel-0.1.1-1.fc40.noarch - nothing provides (crate(chacha20/zeroize) >= 0.9.0 with crate(chacha20/zeroize) < 0.10.0~) needed by rust-crypto_secretbox+chacha20-devel-0.1.1-1.fc40.noarch You will need to either disable the chacha20 support, or package the missing crate (chacha20 version 0.9.*).
Sorry Fabio, where did you see that one? Package is building fine in Rawhide. For F39 & F38 fails because "crate(poly1305/default)" is missing as I've not backported it yet, I'm focusing in rawhide for now.
This is not about *building* correctly but about *installing* correctly. You can reproduce by running a local mock build with "--postinstall" or by attempting to install the results of a build in a rawhide mock chroot. This happens for dependencies for features that are not enabled by default, which is fairly common in Rust crates. Which is why I always recommend to run test builds with "--postinstall".