Bug 225958 - Merge Review: kbd
Summary: Merge Review: kbd
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 19:14 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2009-02-06 11:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-06 11:55:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
manuel.wolfshant: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:14:32 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: kbd

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/kbd/
Initial Owner: mitr

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2009-02-04 00:13:13 UTC
rpmlint is not really happy at all:
rpmlint of source RPM:
kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
kbd.src:23: E: prereq-use initscripts >= 5.86-1
kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
kbd.src: W: no-url-tag

rpmlint of kbd:
kbd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kbd-1.15/ChangeLog
kbd.x86_64: W: no-url-tag


I think that --localedir=/usr/share/locale should be replaced with --localedir=%_datadir/locale

At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I suggest to also add doc/dvorak

Comment 2 manuel wolfshant 2009-02-04 00:14:27 UTC
Seems like the real maintainer is not mitr any more...

Comment 3 Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-02-05 15:17:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)

Hi,

you are right, I'm maintaining kbd currently.

> rpmlint is not really happy at all:
> rpmlint of source RPM:
> kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
> kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
> kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
> kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some package), what do you think?

> kbd.src:23: E: prereq-use initscripts >= 5.86-1
Fixed (changed to plain Requires).

> kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
> kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
> kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
> kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this.

> kbd.src: W: no-url-tag
There's no kbd homepage.

> 
> rpmlint of kbd:
> kbd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/kbd-1.15/ChangeLog
Fixed.

> kbd.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
See above.

> 
> 
> I think that --localedir=/usr/share/locale should be replaced with
> --localedir=%_datadir/locale
Fixed.

> 
> At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I
> suggest to also add doc/dvorak
I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:)

Comment 4 manuel wolfshant 2009-02-05 19:28:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
> > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
> > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
> > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
> OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm
> just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on
> Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some
> package), what do you think?
> 
According to:
  [wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development
  [wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools --repoid=development
you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them.



> > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
> > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
> > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
> > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
> We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this.
OK.



> > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag
> There's no kbd homepage.
How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ?


> > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I
> > suggest to also add doc/dvorak
> I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already
> are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:)
Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them.

Comment 5 Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-02-06 10:42:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes console-tools
> > > kbd.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes open
> > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides console-tools
> > > kbd.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides open
> > OK, Obsoletes is very historical here and it's probably safe to remove it, I'm
> > just not sure about Provides... I'm not able to find good information on
> > Provides/Obsoletes (if console-tools and open Provides are needed by other some
> > package), what do you think?
> > 
> According to:
>   [wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires open --repoid=development
>   [wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --whatrequires console-tools
> --repoid=development
> you can drop the Provides, too. No one seems to require them.
Fixed.

> 
> 
> 
> > > kbd.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ro_win.map.gz
> > > kbd.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/sr-latin.map.gz
> > > kbd.src:80: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/kbd/keymaps/i386/qwerty/ko.map.gz
> > > kbd.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/kbd
> > We want /lib/kbd for every architecture, so I'll not change this.
> OK.
> 
> 
> 
> > > kbd.src: W: no-url-tag
> > There's no kbd homepage.
> How about http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/legion/kbd ?
Well, same URL is in source... But you're probably right, it's better for users than nothing. Fixed.

> 
> 
> > > At least the COPYING file from the root dir should be included as %doc. I
> > > suggest to also add doc/dvorak
> > I agree with COPYING, but disagree with doc/dvorak. I think people that already
> > are using dvorak don't need this kind of info and others much less:)
> Well, say I'd like to give Dvorak a spin and I'll use it side by side with the
> normal QWERTY layout for a while. Wouldn't I need the docs? Having them on my
> system might be more convenient than browsing the net for them.
Fine, I see it might be useful, so it's added.

All changes are written to the CVS, let me know if you have anything else. Thanks for review!

Comment 6 manuel wolfshant 2009-02-06 11:09:12 UTC
Nothing further, let's close it. APPROVED.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.