Bug 226005 - Merge Review: libFS
Merge Review: libFS
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Thomas Spura
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 14:21 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2010-08-30 16:27 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-30 15:55:48 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
tomspur: fedora‑review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 14:21:31 EST
Fedora Merge Review: libFS

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libFS/
Initial Owner: sandmann@redhat.com
Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-07-19 11:05:46 EDT
(CC'ing last modifiers)

Why do you use 'with_static' for deciding to build the static lib or not?

But even, when doing this, you need to package the static libs in a subpackage called 'static' and do NOT place them in the usual devel subpackage...

Either delete that completely or properly package it in a static subpackage...


Other issues:
- Please use INSTALL="install -p" when installing to preserve timestamps
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make
- There is a new version 1.0.2 upstream.
- libFS-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libFS-devel
  libFS.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-devel

The rest looks good so far.
Comment 2 Adam Jackson 2010-08-30 15:55:48 EDT
fixed in libFS-1.0.2-1.fc15
Comment 3 Thomas Spura 2010-08-30 16:27:29 EDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> fixed in libFS-1.0.2-1.fc15

Thanks so far.
Last thing, that _could_ be done is:
- libFS.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libFS-1.0.2/AUTHORS

- parallel make is still not implemented, but unfortunately, that's only SHOULD 
  in the guidelines...

________________________________________________________________________________


APPROVED

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.