Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
Bug 226106 - Merge Review: lrzsz
Merge Review: lrzsz
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jiri Popelka
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-01-31 14:35 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2010-01-06 06:47 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-01-06 06:47:53 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
jpopelka: fedora‑review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 14:35:14 EST
Fedora Merge Review: lrzsz

Initial Owner: than@redhat.com
Comment 1 Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 04:22:45 EST
formal review of lrzsz-0.12.20-27.fc12 is here, see the notes below:

YES source files match upstream:
  b5ce6a74abc9b9eb2af94dffdfd372a4  lrzsz-0.12.20.tar.gz
YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
YES dist tag is present.
YES build root is correct.
YES license field matches the actual license.
YES license is open source-compatible.
YES License text included in package.
YES latest version is being packaged.
YES BuildRequires are proper.
YES compiler flags are appropriate.
YES %clean is present.
YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
YES debuginfo package looks complete.
YES rpmlint is silent.
YES final provides and requires look sane.
YES %check is present and all tests pass.
YES no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
YES owns the directories it creates.
YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
YES no duplicates in %files.
YES file permissions are appropriate.
YES no scriptlets present.
YES code, not content.
YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
YES no headers.
YES no pkgconfig files.
YES no libtool .la droppings.
YES not a GUI app.

This package is APPROVED.
Comment 2 Jiri Popelka 2009-11-26 05:18:24 EST
- YES %check is present and all tests pass.
+ N/A %check is present and all tests pass.

But still APPROVED :-)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.