Bug 226140 - Merge Review: microcode_ctl
Summary: Merge Review: microcode_ctl
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: microcode_ctl
Version: 23
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Anton Arapov
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-01-31 19:40 UTC by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2016-01-12 14:48 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: microcode_ctl-2.1-10
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-01-12 14:48:55 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
spec cleanup as per current packaging guidelines (1.83 KB, patch)
2013-11-14 12:57 UTC, Parag AN(पराग)
no flags Details | Diff

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 19:40:31 UTC
Fedora Merge Review: microcode_ctl

Initial Owner: jcm@redhat.com

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2013-11-12 09:16:57 UTC
  I see from changelog you did some few updates. So here I am suggesting some changes in spec that are required as per current packaging guidelines.

1) Group and Buildroot tag is not needed now. Remove those lines.

2) removal of buildroot in %install not needed
rm -rf %{buildroot}

3) %clean is not needed

4) make command and your %files section should use macros. Below is %files section 
%doc /usr/share/doc/microcode_ctl/*

5) rpmlint on rpms show
microcode_ctl.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Tool to transform and deploy CPU microcode update for x86.
=> remove ending dot in summary

fix above issues. Build new package in master.

Comment 2 Anton Arapov 2013-11-12 09:57:31 UTC
Please prepare the patch against the upstream tree(*) - I will review it and apply later on if everything is ok.

* https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/microcode_ctl.git/tree/microcode_ctl.spec?h=obsolete

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2013-11-14 12:57:01 UTC
Created attachment 823930 [details]
spec cleanup as per current packaging guidelines

Comment 4 Parag AN(पराग) 2014-02-17 04:39:41 UTC
any update here?

Comment 5 Anton Arapov 2014-03-05 13:01:41 UTC
Oh, overlooked the patch you've attached last year. Apologizes.
I will push it upstream a bit later.

Comment 6 Parag AN(पराग) 2014-03-05 13:32:49 UTC
The general workflow for any kind of (merge/package/rename) review is to keep review bug assigned to the person who is going to finally approve the review.

But for tracking purposes if you want this review bug assigned to you then its ok just don't forget to assign me back once you done with package update for further package review.

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2014-03-26 14:10:25 UTC
ping any updates? or allow to commit the patch to me.

Comment 8 Cole Robinson 2015-02-11 20:37:54 UTC
Mass reassigning all merge reviews to their component. For more details, see this FESCO ticket:


If you don't know what merge reviews are about, please see:


How to handle this bug is left to the discretion of the package maintainer.

Comment 9 Jan Kurik 2015-07-15 15:25:03 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 23 development cycle.
Changing version to '23'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 23 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 23 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:

Comment 10 Anton Arapov 2016-01-12 14:48:55 UTC
The issues from the Comment#1 have been addressed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.