Bug 226165 – Merge Review: mt-st

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 226165 - Merge Review: mt-st

Summary:	Merge Review: mt-st

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Miroslav Lichvar
QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-01-31 14:43 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified:	2009-12-02 06:05 EST (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-12-02 06:05:55 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Flags:	mlichvar: fedora‑review+

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 14:43:43 EST

Fedora Merge Review: mt-st

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mt-st/
Initial Owner: jnovy@redhat.com

Comment 1 Radek Brich 2007-09-05 07:02:52 EDT

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: mt-st
Updated Fedora Owners: rbrich@redhat.com

Comment 2 Jindrich Novy 2007-09-05 07:14:35 EDT

Agreed with ownership transition.

Comment 3 Radek Brich 2007-09-05 09:10:08 EDT

canceling request, it's now ok (via pkgdb)

Comment 4 Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-01 11:55:26 EST

Review follows:

OK source files match upstream:
fdd5f5ec673c9f630a102ceff7612774  mt-st-1.1.tar.gz

OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
OK dist tag is present.
OK build root is correct.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK latest version is being packaged.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock.
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
NO rpmlint is silent.
mt-st.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit
mt-st.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit
mt-st.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit
mt-st.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit
mt-st.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name stinit ('mt-st', 'mt-std')

Enabled by default and incoherent name are ok, but the script should be
probably updated to match the Fedora init script guidelines.

OK final provides and requires look sane.
N/A %check is present and all tests pass.
OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK scriptlets are sane.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no libtool .la droppings.
OK not a GUI app.

Comment 5 Dan Horák 2009-12-02 05:46:09 EST

The stinit initscript was recently updated in F-12 and rawhide (see bug 541592 for details) and it doesn't start any daemon, but it does only a one-time initialization of tape devices, so I think it can live as it is.

Comment 6 Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-02 06:05:55 EST

Ok, thanks. The package is APPROVED.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.