Bug 2262110
| Summary: | pulpcore-content does not validate content of downloaded on-demand artifacts before delivering them to clients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Joniel Pasqualetto <jpasqual> |
| Component: | Pulp | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED MIGRATED | QA Contact: | Satellite QE Team <sat-qe-bz-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.13.6 | CC: | dalley, dkliban, ggainey, rchan, rlavi |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | MigratedToJIRA, Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2024-06-06 17:01:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Joniel Pasqualetto
2024-01-31 16:22:27 UTC
Joniel, what do you think is the correct outcome here? There is no HTTP status code for bad checksum, so I think returning status code 410 or 404 might be the best we can do - the original file is very likely gone forever (such is the risk of using on-demand). Any customer that can't tolerate any possibility of such files disappearing probably needs to use immediate mode. Maybe 410 makes the most sense? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/410 Hello Daniel I think 404 makes more sense. The fact that the downloaded artifact is not a match for the checksum we expect may simply mean the file somehow got corrupted upstream and not necessarily is gone forever. On pulp2, when on-demand packages couldn't be retrieved for some reason, I remember getting 404 on the client. This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there. Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated. Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information. To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "SAT-" followed by an integer. You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like: "Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567 In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information. |