Bug 2262810 - Review Request: php-sebastian-exporter6 - Export PHP variables for visualization, version 6
Summary: Review Request: php-sebastian-exporter6 - Export PHP variables for visualizat...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Xavier Bachelot
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/%{gh_owner}/%{gh_p...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2262808
Blocks: 2262811 2262825
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-02-05 14:52 UTC by Remi Collet
Modified: 2025-02-04 06:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-04 06:28:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
xavier: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6986692 to 7107044 (1.07 KB, patch)
2024-03-05 13:46 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7107044 to 7697938 (1.70 KB, patch)
2024-07-02 08:46 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7697938 to 7699805 (2.36 KB, patch)
2024-07-03 05:53 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7699805 to 8343555 (1.43 KB, patch)
2024-12-05 09:25 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8343555 to 8343825 (917 bytes, patch)
2024-12-05 10:31 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Remi Collet 2024-02-05 14:52:56 UTC
Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/php-sebastian-exporter6.git/plain/php-sebastian-exporter6.spec?id=7419709d3eebcfb072bad5752b79ae1adce72311
SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-sebastian-exporter6-6.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm
Description: 
Provides the functionality to export PHP variables for visualization.

This package provides version 6 of sebastian/exporter library.

Autoloader: /usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/Exporter6/autoload.php

Fedora Account System Username: remi


Previous version review bug #2168101

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-05 14:58:44 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6986692
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06986692-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-05 13:46:09 UTC
Created attachment 2020188 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 6986692 to 7107044

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-05 13:46:11 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7107044
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07107044-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Xavier Bachelot 2024-03-08 17:42:02 UTC
- Add a comment about the upstream tarball missing tests

- Drop '# remirepo:*' comments

- The conditional :
```
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 27 || 0%{?rhel} >= 8
BuildRequires:  (php-composer(%{pk_vendor}/recursion-context) >= 6.0 with php-composer(%{pk_vendor}/recursion-context) < 7)
%else
BuildRequires:  php-sebastian-recursion-context6
%endif
```
Could be rewritten as :
```
%if %{?el7}
BuildRequires:  php-sebastian-recursion-context6
%else
BuildRequires:  (php-composer(%{pk_vendor}/recursion-context) >= 6.0 with php-composer(%{pk_vendor}/recursion-context) < 7)
%endif
```
But does EL7 still carry value at this point ?

- Drop `%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}` in %files


Otherwise looks good. Full review incoming.

Comment 6 Remi Collet 2024-03-09 14:17:26 UTC
Please remind that all the stuff needed for all versions (EL-7 and my repository) are auto-removed during import in Fedora repo

Ex, see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-sebastian-exporter5/commits/rawhide
Especially the cleanup commit: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-sebastian-exporter5/c/e1ec1d8b84da7bad2c80baebed36f546a13589cc?branch=rawhide


Please ignore them
Else I will have to duplicate all the spec files for the review

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2024-07-02 08:46:25 UTC
Created attachment 2038690 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7107044 to 7697938

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2024-07-02 08:46:27 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7697938
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07697938-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2024-07-03 05:53:43 UTC
Created attachment 2038731 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7697938 to 7699805

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2024-07-03 05:53:45 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7699805
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07699805-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 14 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-05 09:25:47 UTC
Created attachment 2061328 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7699805 to 8343555

Comment 15 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-05 09:25:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8343555
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08343555-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 17 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-05 10:31:07 UTC
Created attachment 2061329 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8343555 to 8343825

Comment 18 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-05 10:31:09 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8343825
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2262810-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08343825-php-sebastian-exporter6/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 19 Remi Collet 2025-02-04 06:28:46 UTC
Reviewx exception
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/71933


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.