(In reply to Daniel Osypenko from comment #0) > On provider-client mode the Topology does not show rack/zone. > Also there is no zone/rack on node details. > We already closed similar bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178588 This is different from BZ#2178588. Nodes need to have 'topology.kubernetes.io/zone' or 'topology.rook.io/rack' label, for it to get reported on the UI. Since it has none (from the YAML snippet shared in the description), we won't see it on "Topology" page as well. @Daniel is it BareMetal + LSO + Provider mode Cluster or StorageSystem ?? @Nitin shouldn't OCS operator add the "rack" label to the nodes automatically ??
Yeah, the expectation is if the default failure domain is rack, and when rack is set the failure domain the nodes are labeled with the rack labels.
(In reply to Malay Kumar parida from comment #3) > Yeah, the expectation is if the default failure domain is rack, and when > rack is set the failure domain the nodes are labeled with the rack labels. @Daniel plz share StorageCluster YAML as well.
This is a "flexibleScaling" deployment, each node is an individual group in itself (i.e., a "host"). There should not be any grouping based on "rack" or "zone" here. "Topology" page and OCS operator are working as expected.
Is there anything else that is expected from this BZ ?? else we can close it as not a bug.
to document this exclusion. If "flexibleScaling" deployment - no grouping based on "rack" or "zone" expected. @skatiyar
I am moving this BZ to the doc team, in case we have any relevant place where we can add this note for the "Topology" view UI (assuming we really need to add it). But, this is not an edge case or something, this is expected behaviour (flexibleScaling is not a new feature). Unless we manually add the labels to the nodes (for whatever reason), we won't see the grouping on the UI as well in this case.