Bug 2264007 - Please branch python-xattr for EPEL9
Summary: Please branch python-xattr for EPEL9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-xattr
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Otto Liljalaakso
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-02-13 10:18 UTC by Peter Robinson
Modified: 2024-02-25 00:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-xattr-0.10.0-8.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-02-25 00:39:33 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Robinson 2024-02-13 10:18:24 UTC
Would you please branch and buid python-xattr?

Comment 1 Otto Liljalaakso 2024-02-14 17:07:53 UTC
Hi,

I am not involved with EPEL and currently, there are no co-maintainers either. So we would need somebody to step up to maintain this package in EPEL. In case somebody is willing to do that, I will add the necessary permissions.

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2024-02-14 18:40:17 UTC
I can assist, feel free to add me as a co-maintainer (pbrobinson)

Comment 3 Otto Liljalaakso 2024-02-15 19:53:42 UTC
Added commit access to FAS pbrobinson and requested epel9 branch, you should be all set to build it now.

This is a very simple Python package, so I do not foresee any difficulties. But should it happen that EPEL needs different treatment from Fedora, I ask you to prefer diverging the Git branches rather than using conditionals in the rawhide branch - since I do not have any experience in EPEL, I might accidentally break such conditional specfile.

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2024-02-16 08:53:18 UTC
> Added commit access to FAS pbrobinson and requested epel9 branch, you should
> be all set to build it now.

Thanks

> This is a very simple Python package, so I do not foresee any difficulties.
> But should it happen that EPEL needs different treatment from Fedora, I ask
> you to prefer diverging the Git branches rather than using conditionals in
> the rawhide branch - since I do not have any experience in EPEL, I might
> accidentally break such conditional specfile.

I avoid EPEL myself as much as possible, but it's very similar to Fedora and pretty hard to break TBH, especially with a straight forward package like this. I'll en devour to keep this as straight forward as possible for both of us :)

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-02-16 09:09:16 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-95f57bb40c (python-xattr-0.10.0-8.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-95f57bb40c

Comment 6 Peter Robinson 2024-02-16 09:11:09 UTC
Otto, thank you very much for your assistance here.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-02-17 01:08:17 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-95f57bb40c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-95f57bb40c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-02-25 00:39:33 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-95f57bb40c (python-xattr-0.10.0-8.el9 and rpm-head-signing-1.7.4-4.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.