Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 2264175

Summary:	Glusterfs Storage Domain based can't be activated if the Storage Server is down
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	José Enrique <josgutie>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	José Enrique <josgutie>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Lukas Svaty <lsvaty>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	4.5.3	CC:	aesteve, lsurette, mavital, michal.skrivanek, srevivo, ycui
Target Milestone:	ovirt-4.5.3-1
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2024-06-10 11:56:59 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description José Enrique 2024-02-14 11:47:03 UTC

Description of problem:

Glusterfs Storage Domain based can't be activated if the Storage Server is down

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
- RHHI 1.8
- vdsm 4.5.3.1

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Put on maintenance the vmstore SD.
2. Shutdown the Storage Server.
3. vmstore SD can't be activated.

Actual results:

Storage Domain can't be activated even the glusterfs is quorated.

Expected results:

Activate Storage Domain without needing the Storage Server available.

Additional info:

Comment 8 meital avital 2024-06-06 10:28:53 UTC

Moving to Verified according to QE automation Passed successfully.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2024-06-10 11:56:59 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (vdsm bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2024:3750