Bug 2264206 - Review Request: rocm-validation-suite - ROCm Validation Test Suite
Summary: Review Request: rocm-validation-suite - ROCm Validation Test Suite
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/ROCm/ROCmValidatio...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-02-14 14:34 UTC by Tom Rix
Modified: 2025-06-11 06:06 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7015749 to 7156062 (1.78 KB, patch)
2024-03-14 00:37 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Tom Rix 2024-02-14 14:34:19 UTC
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocm-validation-suite.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/rocm-validation-suite-6.0.2-1.fc40.src.rpm

The ROCm Validation Suite (RVS) is a system validation and                                                                                                   
diagnostics tool for monitoring, stress testing, detecting                                                                                                   
and troubleshooting issues that affects the functionality                                                                                                    
and performance of AMD GPU(s) operating in a                                                                                                                 
high-performance/AI/ML computing environment. RVS is enabled                                                                                                 
using the ROCm software stack on a compatible software and                                                                                                   
hardware platform.




Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Tom Rix 2024-02-14 14:39:05 UTC
This package is only intended for testing.
I do not believe it was ever ment to be packaged and has a lot of rough parts so I hope it will get a pass on the usual expected quality.
I expect the package to be used by users to test their particular card and report problems or by some to be defined fedora c/i.

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2024-02-14 14:55:36 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7015749
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2264206-rocm-validation-suite/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07015749-rocm-validation-suite/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Sergey Bostandzhyan 2024-03-13 18:48:23 UTC
I tried out the src.rpm

The line in the spec:

%global build_cxxflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed -e 's/-fcf-protection// -e 's/-fcf-protection//' -e 's/-ffat-lto-objects//')

is missing an aphostrophe at the end of the second sed:

%global build_cxxflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed -e 's/-fcf-protection//' -e 's/-fcf-protection//' -e 's/-ffat-lto-objects//')

After fixing this locally and building the package I can confirm that rvs ran through without errors on my gfx900

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-14 00:37:10 UTC
Created attachment 2021523 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7015749 to 7156062

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-14 00:37:13 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7156062
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2264206-rocm-validation-suite/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07156062-rocm-validation-suite/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Tom Rix 2024-03-15 12:29:36 UTC
The spec has been fixed
Thanks!

Comment 8 Germano Massullo 2025-05-07 12:04:35 UTC
Hello, do you still need help with the package review?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.