Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 226474 - Merge Review: systemtap
Merge Review: systemtap
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 16:07 EST by Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Modified: 2012-11-23 20:25 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-11-23 20:25:06 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
rpmlint output on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm (5.33 KB, text/plain)
2007-04-20 12:14 EDT, David Smith 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it 2007-01-31 16:07:49 EST 
Fedora Merge Review: systemtap

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/systemtap/
Initial Owner: fche@redhat.com
Comment 1 David Smith 2007-04-20 12:14:19 EDT 
Created attachment 153193 [details]
rpmlint output on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm
Comment 2 David Smith 2007-04-20 12:17:23 EDT 
There are no rpmlint warnings output on systemtap-runtime-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm.

There are 3 classes of rpmlint warnings on systemtap-0.5.13-1.fc6.i386.rpm:

- W: systemtap devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/share/systemtap/runtime/*.[ch] (48 instances)

Since the systemtap package is basically a code generator/compiler,
these warnings can be ignored.  Those files could be put in a devel rpm, but the
main rpm would always have to require the devel rpm, making the separation
pointless.

- W: systemtap spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/small_demos/* (13 instances)

rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes
several demo scripts that are marked as executable.

- W: systemtap doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/systemtap-0.5.13/examples/socktop /bin/bash (1 instance)

rpmlint doesn't like the fact that the systemtap package includes
one demo script that is a bash script.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.