Bug 2264767 - [4.15][RDR][Hub Recovery] Failover remains stuck with WaitForReadiness
Summary: [4.15][RDR][Hub Recovery] Failover remains stuck with WaitForReadiness
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: odf-dr
Version: 4.15
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.16.0
Assignee: Raghavendra Talur
QA Contact: Aman Agrawal
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2267965
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-02-18 20:06 UTC by Aman Agrawal
Modified: 2024-11-15 04:25 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 2267965 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-07-17 13:14:01 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github RamenDR ramen pull 1222 0 None open Lower s3timeout to reasonable duration 2024-03-05 15:39:42 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ramen pull 210 0 None open Bug 2264767: Lower s3timeout to reasonable duration 2024-03-05 18:26:47 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:4591 0 None None None 2024-07-17 13:14:04 UTC

Description Aman Agrawal 2024-02-18 20:06:11 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
ODF 4.15.0-132.stable
OCP 4.15.0-0.nightly-2024-02-13-231030
ACM 2.9.2 GA'ed
Submariner 0.16.3
ceph version 17.2.6-194.el9cp (d9f4aedda0fc0d99e7e0e06892a69523d2eb06dc) quincy (stable)



Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
**Active hub at neutral site**

1. Deployed multiple rbd and cephfs backed workloads of both appset and subscription types.
2. Failedover and relocated them in such a way that they are finally running on the primary managed cluster (which is expected to host all the workloads and can go under disaster) but the apps which were failedover from C1 to C2 were relocated back to C1 and the apps which were relocated to C2 were failedover to C1 (with all nodes up and running).
Ensure that we have all workloads combinations in distinct states like deployed, failedover, relocated on C1, and a few workloads in deployed state on C2 as well.
4. Let the latest backups be taken at least 1 for all the different states of the workloads (when progression is completed and no action is going on any of the workloads). Also ensure sync for all the workloads when on active hub is working fine and cluster is healthy. Note drpc -o wide, lastGroupSyncTime, download backups from S3, etc.
5. Bring active hub completely down, move to passive hub. Restore backps, ensure velero backup reports successful restoration. Make sure both the managed clusters are successfully reported, drpolicy gets validated.
6. Wait for drpc to be restored, check if all the workloads are in their last backedup state or not.
They seem to have retained their last state which was backedup. So everything is fine so far.
7. Let IOs continue for a few hours (20-30hrs). Failover the cephfs workloads running on C2 to C1 with all nodes of C2 up and running.
8. After successful failover and cleanup, wait for sync to resume and after some time bring primary cluster down (all nodes). Bring it up after a few hours.
9. Check if drpc state is still the same and data sync for all workload is resuming as expected.
10. After a few hours, bring master nodes of primary cluster down and failover all the workloads running on primary after the cluster is marked offline on RHACM console and observe the failover status.


Output collected around Sunday 18 February 2024 07:55:50 PM UTC (long after failover was triggered)

amagrawa:hub$ drpc
NAMESPACE              NAME                                    AGE    PREFERREDCLUSTER   FAILOVERCLUSTER   DESIREDSTATE   CURRENTSTATE   PROGRESSION        START TIME             DURATION       PEER READY
busybox-workloads-13   sub-rbd-busybox13-placement-1-drpc      2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:20:17Z                  False
busybox-workloads-14   sub-rbd-busybox14-placement-1-drpc      2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:20:25Z                  False
busybox-workloads-15   sub-rbd-busybox15-placement-1-drpc      2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:20:33Z                  False
busybox-workloads-16   sub-rbd-busybox16-placement-1-drpc      2d9h   amagrawa-odf2                                       Deployed       Completed          2024-02-16T10:12:51Z   660.371688ms   True
busybox-workloads-5    sub-cephfs-busybox5-placement-1-drpc    2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Relocate       Relocating                        2024-02-18T19:16:07Z                  False
busybox-workloads-6    sub-cephfs-busybox6-placement-1-drpc    2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:19:49Z                  False
busybox-workloads-7    sub-cephfs-busybox7-placement-1-drpc    2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:19:59Z                  False
busybox-workloads-8    sub-cephfs-busybox8-placement-1-drpc    2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:20:06Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-cephfs-busybox1-placement-drpc   2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:18:33Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-cephfs-busybox2-placement-drpc   2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:18:38Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-cephfs-busybox3-placement-drpc   2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:18:43Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-cephfs-busybox4-placement-drpc   2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up        2024-02-18T19:18:48Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-rbd-busybox10-placement-drpc     2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:18:52Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-rbd-busybox11-placement-drpc     2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:18:58Z                  False
openshift-gitops       appset-rbd-busybox12-placement-drpc     2d9h   amagrawa-odf2                                       Deployed       Completed          2024-02-16T10:13:47Z   571.259493ms   True
openshift-gitops       appset-rbd-busybox9-placement-drpc      2d9h   amagrawa-prim      amagrawa-odf2     Failover       FailedOver     WaitForReadiness   2024-02-18T19:19:17Z                  False

Failover remains stuck for multiple apps at WaitForReadiness which leads to application downtime and their inaccessibility.
 
Actual results: [RDR] [Hub recovery] [Neutral] Failover remains stuck with WaitForReadiness

Expected results: Failover should complete maintaining permissible RPO/RTO of 2xsync interval.


Additional info:

Comment 5 Mudit Agarwal 2024-02-26 11:55:04 UTC
Aman/Benamar, does this issue affects only neural or co-situated also?

Comment 27 krishnaram Karthick 2024-03-18 10:12:57 UTC
verification of this bug will be done as part of Hub recovery testing post 4.15. No regression seen so far. 
Moving the bug to 4.16.

Comment 33 Aman Agrawal 2024-05-30 18:16:08 UTC
Based upon Comment27, the fix was tested in ODF 4.16.


Tested with following versions:

ceph version 18.2.1-188.el9cp (b1ae9c989e2f41dcfec0e680c11d1d9465b1db0e) reef (stable)
OCP 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-05-23-173505
ACM 2.11.0-DOWNSTREAM-2024-05-23-15-16-26
MCE 2.6.0-104 
ODF 4.16.0-108.stable
Gitops v1.12.3 

Platform- VMware

When the steps to reproduce is repeated, Failover was successful for all RBD and CephFS workloads and VolumeReplicationClass was successfully restored on the surviving managed cluster (which is needed for RBD).

oc get volumereplicationclass -A
NAME                                    PROVISIONER
rbd-volumereplicationclass-1625360775   openshift-storage.rbd.csi.ceph.com
rbd-volumereplicationclass-473128587    openshift-storage.rbd.csi.ceph.com


DRPC from new hub-

busybox-workloads-101   rbd-sub-busybox101-placement-1-drpc       4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:26:02Z                        False
busybox-workloads-13    cephfs-sub-busybox13-placement-1-drpc     4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:27:33Z                        False
busybox-workloads-16    cephfs-sub-busybox16-placement-1-drpc     4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:27:26Z                        False
busybox-workloads-18    cnv-sub-busybox18-placement-1-drpc        4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T16:52:14Z                        False
busybox-workloads-5     rbd-sub-busybox5-placement-1-drpc         4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:25:50Z                        False
busybox-workloads-6     rbd-sub-busybox6-placement-1-drpc         4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:25:56Z                        False
busybox-workloads-7     rbd-sub-busybox7-placement-1-drpc         4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:25:34Z                        False
openshift-gitops        cephfs-appset-busybox12-placement-drpc    4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:28:14Z                        False
openshift-gitops        cephfs-appset-busybox9-placement-drpc     4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:28:19Z                        False
openshift-gitops        cnv-appset-busybox17-placement-drpc       4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T16:52:23Z                        False
openshift-gitops        rbd-appset-busybox1-placement-drpc        4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:26:08Z                        False
openshift-gitops        rbd-appset-busybox100-placement-drpc      4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:26:14Z                        False
openshift-gitops        rbd-appset-busybox2-placement-drpc        4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:26:20Z                        False
openshift-gitops        rbd-appset-busybox3-placement-drpc        4h51m   amagrawa-c1-28my   amagrawa-c2-my28   Failover       FailedOver     Cleaning Up   2024-05-30T15:26:49Z                        False

Since the primary managed cluster is still down, PROGRESSION is reporting Cleaning Up which is expected.

Failover was successful on 2 CNV (RBD) workloads  cnv-sub-busybox18-placement-1-drpc and cnv-appset-busybox17-placement-drpc as well of both subscription and appset (pull model) types respectively and the data written into the VM was successfully restored after failover completion.


Fix for this BZ LGTM. Therefore I am marking this bug as verified.

Comment 36 errata-xmlrpc 2024-07-17 13:14:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.16.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4591

Comment 37 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-11-15 04:25:18 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.