Bug 2266645 - hid4java fails to build with java-21-openjdk
Summary: hid4java fails to build with java-21-openjdk
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: hid4java
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jonny Heggheim
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2262141
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-02-28 16:55 UTC by Petra Alice Mikova
Modified: 2024-03-13 13:18 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-03-13 12:41:14 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petra Alice Mikova 2024-02-28 16:55:36 UTC
hid4java fails to build with java-21-openjdk as sytem JDK. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java21.

For the build logs, see: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=114134005
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4146/114134146/state.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4146/114134146/build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4146/114134146/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4146/114134146/mock_output.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4146/114134146/hw_info.log
We run the rebuild in side tag f41-build-side-84507, but as fail ratio was small, we expect this side tag to be merged into rawhide ASAP.
To reproduce before this date simply: fedpkg clone hid4java; cd hid4java;  fedpkg build --target f41-build-side-84507; #The target is crucial.
After merge, the usual fedpkg build in rawhide should do.

We had tried aprox 400 packages, and aprox 55 had failed, so the java-21-openjdk will be system JDK in f40, and you should fix your package if you want to keep it alive. Usually the fix is simple, and best is to update the package to latest upstream version. Fix the issue in both f40 and rawhide, if possible, the side tag and rebuild of f40 (and bugs) will follow soon.
Let us know here if you have any questions, here in bug, or at java-devel.org .

We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side if needed.

Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2024-03-13 13:18:31 UTC
"NOTABUG" is confusing, because it implies that the declared issue is not considered a problem. But in fact, if the package didn't build, we would consider this a problem. Instead, you built it, and it works, which is better classified as "WORKSFORME".


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.