Bug 2268675 - SELinux is preventing abrt-dump-journ from 'write' accesses on the sock_file io.systemd.Machine.
Summary: SELinux is preventing abrt-dump-journ from 'write' accesses on the sock_file ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2266786
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Zdenek Pytela
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:a7ebe5d62b0552fb1babfb9e9dd...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-03-09 12:20 UTC by Michal Srb
Modified: 2024-03-12 18:33 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-03-12 18:33:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: description (2.05 KB, text/plain)
2024-03-09 12:20 UTC, Michal Srb
no flags Details
File: os_info (756 bytes, text/plain)
2024-03-09 12:21 UTC, Michal Srb
no flags Details

Description Michal Srb 2024-03-09 12:20:55 UTC
Description of problem:
vscode edit crashed on a freshly upgraded f40 laptop
SELinux is preventing abrt-dump-journ from 'write' accesses on the sock_file io.systemd.Machine.

*****  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests   **************************

If you believe that abrt-dump-journ should be allowed write access on the io.systemd.Machine sock_file by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# ausearch -c 'abrt-dump-journ' --raw | audit2allow -M my-abrtdumpjourn
# semodule -X 300 -i my-abrtdumpjourn.pp

Additional Information:
Source Context                system_u:system_r:abrt_dump_oops_t:s0
Target Context                system_u:object_r:systemd_userdbd_runtime_t:s0
Target Objects                io.systemd.Machine [ sock_file ]
Source                        abrt-dump-journ
Source Path                   abrt-dump-journ
Port                          <Unknown>
Host                          (removed)
Source RPM Packages           
Target RPM Packages           
SELinux Policy RPM            selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch
Local Policy RPM              selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
Host Name                     (removed)
Platform                      Linux (removed) 6.8.0-0.rc6.49.fc40.x86_64 #1 SMP
                              PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 26 18:38:52 UTC 2024
                              x86_64
Alert Count                   8
First Seen                    2024-03-09 13:14:50 CET
Last Seen                     2024-03-09 13:14:50 CET
Local ID                      ec5e0bc5-3e8a-47b3-89e1-91fe22fe85cc

Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1709986490.153:394): avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=1485 comm="abrt-dump-journ" name="io.systemd.Machine" dev="tmpfs" ino=2043 scontext=system_u:system_r:abrt_dump_oops_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:systemd_userdbd_runtime_t:s0 tclass=sock_file permissive=0


Hash: abrt-dump-journ,abrt_dump_oops_t,systemd_userdbd_runtime_t,sock_file,write

Version-Release number of selected component:
selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.17.15
reason:         SELinux is preventing abrt-dump-journ from 'write' accesses on the sock_file io.systemd.Machine.
package:        selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch
component:      selinux-policy
hashmarkername: setroubleshoot
type:           libreport
kernel:         6.8.0-0.rc6.49.fc40.x86_64
comment:        vscode edit crashed on a freshly upgraded f40 laptop
component:      selinux-policy

Comment 1 Michal Srb 2024-03-09 12:20:59 UTC
Created attachment 2020804 [details]
File: description

Comment 2 Michal Srb 2024-03-09 12:21:01 UTC
Created attachment 2020805 [details]
File: os_info

Comment 3 Michal Srb 2024-03-09 12:24:51 UTC
SELinux alert browser also shows the following problem that happened at the same time:

SELinux is preventing abrt-server from using the nnp_transition access on a process.

*****  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests   **************************

If you believe that abrt-server should be allowed nnp_transition access on processes labeled abrt_handle_event_t by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# ausearch -c 'abrt-server' --raw | audit2allow -M my-abrtserver
# semodule -X 300 -i my-abrtserver.pp

Additional Information:
Source Context                system_u:system_r:abrt_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
Target Context                system_u:system_r:abrt_handle_event_t:s0-
                              s0:c0.c1023
Target Objects                Unknown [ process2 ]
Source                        abrt-server
Source Path                   abrt-server
Port                          <Unknown>
Host                          fedora
Source RPM Packages           
Target RPM Packages           
SELinux Policy RPM            selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch
Local Policy RPM              selinux-policy-targeted-40.13-1.fc40.noarch
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
Host Name                     fedora
Platform                      Linux fedora 6.8.0-0.rc6.49.fc40.x86_64 #1 SMP
                              PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 26 18:38:52 UTC 2024
                              x86_64
Alert Count                   20
First Seen                    2024-02-11 18:07:20 CET
Last Seen                     2024-03-09 13:14:50 CET
Local ID                      40e027ea-872f-4a5c-88a3-a13996cc6aad

Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1709986490.182:395): avc:  denied  { nnp_transition } for  pid=8994 comm="abrt-server" scontext=system_u:system_r:abrt_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:system_r:abrt_handle_event_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process2 permissive=0


Hash: abrt-server,abrt_t,abrt_handle_event_t,process2,nnp_transition

Comment 4 Zdenek Pytela 2024-03-12 18:33:51 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2266786 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.