Bug 2269281 - Review Request: ruqola - Qt-based client for Rocket Chat
Summary: Review Request: ruqola - Qt-based client for Rocket Chat
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://invent.kde.org/network/%{name}
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-03-12 23:04 UTC by Steve Cossette
Modified: 2024-03-27 00:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-03-26 01:45:41 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7156066 to 7165575 (261 bytes, patch)
2024-03-15 20:25 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Steve Cossette 2024-03-12 23:04:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruqola/ruqola.spec
SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruqola/ruqola-2.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
Ruqola is a Rocket chat client for the KDE desktop.

Fedora Account System Username: farchord

Comment 1 Steve Cossette 2024-03-12 23:05:53 UTC
FYI for this review, I split off the documentation to a separate package. But I wasn't sure if I needed/wanted to set the documentation to be required to be installed on runtime. I would appreciate feedback here.

Comment 2 Steve Cossette 2024-03-13 20:59:33 UTC
Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruqola/ruqola.spec
SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ruqola/ruqola-2.1.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Removed doc requirement, changed libdir macros in %files

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-13 22:18:41 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7155762
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2269281-ruqola/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07155762-ruqola/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file moc_licensesisenterprisejob.cpp is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-14 00:46:33 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7156066
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2269281-ruqola/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07156066-ruqola/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file moc_licensesisenterprisejob.cpp is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-15 20:25:35 UTC
Created attachment 2021857 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7156066 to 7165575

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-15 20:25:38 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7165575
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2269281-ruqola/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07165575-ruqola/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file moc_licensesisenterprisejob.cpp is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 8 Neal Gompa 2024-03-26 01:42:20 UTC
Review notes:

* Package follows Fedora Packaging Guidelines
* Package builds and installs
* Package licensing is correctly handled
* No serious issues from rpmlint

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 9 Steve Cossette 2024-03-26 01:44:09 UTC
Thank you for the review, Neal

Comment 10 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-03-26 01:44:20 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruqola

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2024-03-26 13:54:05 UTC
FEDORA-2024-6e828b7340 (Initial release of ruqola) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6e828b7340

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2024-03-27 00:15:09 UTC
FEDORA-2024-6e828b7340 (Initial release of ruqola) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.