Bug 2271417 - Review Request: gap-pkg-permut - Permutability in finite groups for GAP
Summary: Review Request: gap-pkg-permut - Permutability in finite groups for GAP
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Benson Muite
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://gap-packages.github.io/permut/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-03-25 15:04 UTC by Jerry James
Modified: 2024-04-19 21:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-04-19 21:23:56 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
benson_muite: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jerry James 2024-03-25 15:04:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-permut/gap-pkg-permut.spec
SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-permut/gap-pkg-permut-2.0.5-1.fc41.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: jjames
Description: The package permut contains some functions to deal with permutability in finite groups.

I am happy to swap reviews.

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-03-25 15:12:45 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7212082
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2271417-gap-pkg-permut/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07212082-gap-pkg-permut/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Benson Muite 2024-03-26 06:42:53 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
     2". 61 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/fedora/2271417-gap-pkg-permut/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/gap/pkg, /usr/share/gap
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 6347 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gap-pkg-permut-2.0.5-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          gap-pkg-permut-doc-2.0.5-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          gap-pkg-permut-2.0.5-1.fc41.src.rpm
========================================= rpmlint session starts ========================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpv9j7xup2')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

gap-pkg-permut.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Permutability', 'Summary(en_US) Permutability -> Per mutability, Per-mutability, Permeability')
gap-pkg-permut.noarch: E: spelling-error ('permutability', '%description -l en_US permutability -> per mutability, per-mutability, permeability')
gap-pkg-permut.src: E: spelling-error ('Permutability', 'Summary(en_US) Permutability -> Per mutability, Per-mutability, Permeability')
gap-pkg-permut.src: E: spelling-error ('permutability', '%description -l en_US permutability -> per mutability, per-mutability, permeability')
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/chooser.html ../../GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/lefttoc.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/manual.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/manual.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/nocolorprompt.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/ragged.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/rainbow.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/times.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/toggless.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/toggless.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
=== 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 11 warnings, 12 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.5 s ==




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

gap-pkg-permut.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Permutability', 'Summary(en_US) Permutability -> Per mutability, Per-mutability, Permeability')
gap-pkg-permut.noarch: E: spelling-error ('permutability', '%description -l en_US permutability -> per mutability, per-mutability, permeability')
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/chooser.html ../../GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/lefttoc.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/manual.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/manual.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/nocolorprompt.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/ragged.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/rainbow.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/times.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/toggless.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-permut-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/gap/pkg/permut/doc/toggless.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings, 8 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/gap-packages/permut/releases/download/v2.0.5/permut-2.0.5.tar.bz2 :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4e8565fd74a34d55ec686bc80beda013a9f4050fb0176455fccbfe0eac72caec
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4e8565fd74a34d55ec686bc80beda013a9f4050fb0176455fccbfe0eac72caec


Requires
--------
gap-pkg-permut (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gap-pkg-format

gap-pkg-permut-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gap-online-help
    gap-pkg-format-doc
    gap-pkg-permut



Provides
--------
gap-pkg-permut:
    gap-pkg-permut

gap-pkg-permut-doc:
    gap-pkg-permut-doc



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/fedora/2271417-gap-pkg-permut/srpm/gap-pkg-permut.spec        2024-03-25 18:39:49.231601813 +0000
+++ /home/fedora/2271417-gap-pkg-permut/srpm-unpacked/gap-pkg-permut.spec       2024-03-25 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -31,5 +31,6 @@
 # Nimbus: AGPL-3.0-only
 # RSFS: LicenseRef-Rsfs
-License:        GPL-2.0-or-later AND OFL-1.1-RFN AND Knuth-CTAN AND AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-Rsfs
+# StandardSymL: GPL-1.0-or-later
+License:        GPL-2.0-or-later AND OFL-1.1-RFN AND Knuth-CTAN AND AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-Rsfs AND GPL-1.0-or-later
 Summary:        Permut documentation
 Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}


Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2271417
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-aarch64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: C/C++, PHP, Ocaml, Python, Java, R, Haskell, Perl, SugarActivity, fonts
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Some warnings:
+ gap makedoc.g
 ┌───────┐   GAP 4.13.0 of 2024-03-15
 │  GAP  │   https://www.gap-system.org
 └───────┘   Architecture: aarch64-redhat-linux-gnu-default64-kv9
 Configuration:  gmp 6.3.0, GASMAN, readline
 Loading the library and packages ...
#I  autpgrp package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  alnuth package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  crisp package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  ctbllib package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  factint package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  fga package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  irredsol package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  laguna package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  polenta package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  polycyclic package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  resclasses package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  sophus package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')
#I  tomlib package is not available. Check that the name is correct
#I  and it is present in one of the GAP root directories (see '??RootPaths')

b) Nice that javascript and css files are shared across GAP packages

c) Directory ownership seems to be a bug with Fedora-review

d) Approved

e) Review of one of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271521
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271504
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269966
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2268776
would be appreciated.

Comment 3 Benson Muite 2024-03-26 06:48:31 UTC
Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=115448016

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-03-27 02:38:17 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap-pkg-permut

Comment 5 Jerry James 2024-03-27 02:42:34 UTC
Thank you very much for the review.  I have taken 3 of the 4 you want reviewed.  (The 4th was already taken.)

Those warnings are typical for GAP package builds.  For any given package build, we don't need all of the packages that GAP considers default, so it issues warnings about the missing ones.  The fact that they are missing doesn't hurt anything.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2024-03-28 01:25:07 UTC
FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab (gap-pkg-permut-2.0.5-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-03-29 02:54:54 UTC
FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-04-19 21:23:56 UTC
FEDORA-2024-47239a1eab (gap-pkg-permut-2.0.5-1.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.