Bug 2272629 - new upstream versions available
Summary: new upstream versions available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rtl-sdr
Version: 39
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://osmocom.org/news/227
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-02 10:41 UTC by Michael Tatarinov
Modified: 2024-11-28 11:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rtl-sdr-2.0.1-1.fc41
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-11-28 11:55:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Tatarinov 2024-04-02 10:41:20 UTC
Hello
The current version is out-of-date. Please update to the latest version.

https://osmocom.org/news/227

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-04-04 12:30:49 UTC
It is not as old as it may seem. It's a git snapshot before the 2.0 version bump which has most of the fixes (e.g. rltsdr v4 support). I will rebase it to the 2.0.1 in the rawhide, but probably not in f39, because due to the version bump from 0.6.0 to 2.0.X, it would require recompilation of all deps which is problematic in the stable release.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2024-04-04 12:59:58 UTC
FEDORA-2024-a1d18acfa2 (rtl-sdr-2.0.1-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a1d18acfa2

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2024-04-04 13:03:21 UTC
FEDORA-2024-a1d18acfa2 (rtl-sdr-2.0.1-1.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 4 Michael Tatarinov 2024-04-05 03:26:49 UTC
Hello
I don't agree with you. Some patches are very useful.
Is it possible update in f40?

Thanks.

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2024-04-05 15:58:40 UTC
Hi. This broke rawhide composes. It's got a soname bump in it and rng-tools breaks (which is on the server boot.iso). 

I am going to untag it from f41 for now. Can you please rebuild dependent packages in a side tag, etc:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#rawhide

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12054

Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-04-08 09:43:32 UTC
(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #5)
> Hi. This broke rawhide composes. It's got a soname bump in it and rng-tools
> breaks (which is on the server boot.iso). 
> 
> I am going to untag it from f41 for now. Can you please rebuild dependent
> packages in a side tag, etc:
> 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#rawhide
> 
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12054

OK, I will rebuild.

Comment 7 Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-04-08 09:44:42 UTC
(In reply to Michael Tatarinov from comment #4)
> Hello
> I don't agree with you. Some patches are very useful.
> Is it possible update in f40?
> 
> Thanks.

Which patches? I could backport. Soname bump is nearly impossible, there are many packages requiring rebuild and some are out of my control.

Comment 8 Kevin Fenzi 2024-04-10 22:20:25 UTC
BTW, I see you rebuilt all the deps in a side tag. Thanks!

Unfortunately, due to the way bodhi works, since there was already an update with the rtl-sdr build, it didn't add it to the update with the rest. :(

I just manually retagged it back in and we should be all ok now. 

Thanks for the prompt action.

Comment 9 Michael Tatarinov 2024-04-12 06:35:10 UTC
Hello

The ABI didn't change. Can you update version with this patch?

https://osmocom.org/projects/rtl-sdr/repository/rtl-sdr/revisions/7ebcb041f2ce887ef4d1a64607558889a86ff169

Comment 10 Jaroslav Škarvada 2024-04-16 10:03:20 UTC
(In reply to Michael Tatarinov from comment #9)
> Hello
> 
> The ABI didn't change. Can you update version with this patch?
> 
> https://osmocom.org/projects/rtl-sdr/repository/rtl-sdr/revisions/
> 7ebcb041f2ce887ef4d1a64607558889a86ff169

This is really stupid, it seems we will have to do all the crazy rawhide rebuild again :)

The good thing is that we can now build it for older fedoras as well, but I will probably wait for the stable release.

Comment 11 Aoife Moloney 2024-11-13 12:21:14 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 39 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 39 on 2024-11-26.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '39'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 39 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 12 Aoife Moloney 2024-11-28 11:55:49 UTC
Fedora Linux 39 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2024-11-26.

Fedora Linux 39 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.