Bug 227328 – RFE - parallelise scripts that can be parallelised - w/ patch

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.

Bug 227328 - RFE - parallelise scripts that can be parallelised - w/ patch

Summary:	RFE - parallelise scripts that can be parallelised - w/ patch

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	initscripts (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Bill Nottingham
QA Contact:	Brock Organ
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-02-05 05:08 EST by Nigel Horne
Modified:	2014-03-16 23:05 EDT (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-04-16 18:39:23 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Patch to parallelise scripts which can be parellilised (3.76 KB, patch) 2007-02-05 05:08 EST, Nigel Horne	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Nigel Horne 2007-02-05 05:08:30 EST

Description of problem:
This patch enhances boot/shutdown by running some services in parallel, where
allowed.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
initscripts-8.45.7-1

How reproducible:
n/a - it's an enhancement

Steps to Reproduce:
1. n/a - it's an enhancement
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
n/a - it's an enhancement


Expected results:
n/a - it's an enhancement

Additional info:
Patch attached

Comment 1 Nigel Horne 2007-02-05 05:08:30 EST

Created attachment 147346 [details]
Patch to parallelise scripts which can be parellilised

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2007-04-16 18:39:23 EDT

By not waiting for dependencies (implicit or explicit) this is likely to cause
failures. Unless I'm misreading the patch.

Comment 3 Nigel Horne 2007-04-17 05:28:48 EDT

You're misreading the patch. Note the word "can" in the subject.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.