Bug 2273705 - [RDR] [Discovered Apps] ramenOpsNamespace should be set by default and required namespace should be created by ramen or mco operator
Summary: [RDR] [Discovered Apps] ramenOpsNamespace should be set by default and requir...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: odf-dr
Version: 4.16
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.16.0
Assignee: Raghavendra Talur
QA Contact: Pratik Surve
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-05 18:48 UTC by Pratik Surve
Modified: 2024-07-17 13:18 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.16.0-102
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-07-17 13:18:31 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github RamenDR ramen pull 1342 0 None Merged Add configuration for KubeObjectProtection and MultiNamespace 2024-05-02 14:49:23 UTC
Github RamenDR ramen pull 1366 0 None open drcluster: create ramenOps ns on hub and managed cluster 2024-05-13 05:15:02 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:4591 0 None None None 2024-07-17 13:18:32 UTC

Description Pratik Surve 2024-04-05 18:48:56 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
[RDR] ramenOpsNamespace should be set by default and required namespace should be created by ramen or mco operator 

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):

OCP version:- 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-04-03-065948
ODF version:- 4.16.0-69
CEPH version:- ceph version 18.2.1-76.el9cp (2517f8a5ef5f5a6a22013b2fb11a591afd474668) reef (stable)
ACM version:- 2.10.0
SUBMARINER version:- v0.17.0
VOLSYNC version:- volsync-product.v0.9.0
VOLSYNC method:- destinationCopyMethod: Direct

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?


Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:
The user must set the namespace value for ramenOpsNamespace in the Ramen Hub configmap and ensure that namespace exists before adding the value.

Expected results:
Namespace should be created by the ramen or mco operator, and value should be set by default.

Additional info:

Comment 4 Mudit Agarwal 2024-05-07 06:04:51 UTC
Talur, can you please backport it to 4.16

Comment 7 Raghavendra Talur 2024-05-13 05:15:02 UTC
(In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #4)
> Talur, can you please backport it to 4.16

Mudit, PR 1342 is already backported. Automatic creation of the namespace is handled in https://github.com/RamenDR/ramen/pull/1366 and it is in POST now.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2024-07-17 13:18:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.16.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4591


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.