Please branch and build python-psycopg3 in epel9. If you do not wish to maintain python-psycopg3 in epel9, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package; please add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psycopg3/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: salimma); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psycopg3/adduser
*** Bug 2274648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Builds with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-psycopg3/pull-request/8 (though note that Koji epel9 build is broken at the moment), tested locally with mock ``` $ cat ~/.config/mock/epel9-next-postgresql-x86_64.cfg include('/etc/mock/centos-stream+epel-next-9-x86_64.cfg') config_opts['root'] = 'epel9-next-postgresql-x86_64' config_opts['module_enable'] = ['postgresql:15'] $ V=epel9-next-postgresql mock -r $V-(uname -m) --chain --localrepo=./repo/ --postinstall ./*.src.rpm ```
linking JIRA for requesting the missing postgresql-test-rpm-macros subpackage needed for testing, that the PR currently works around by borrowing the needed definitions
added link to simpler PR that does the bare minimum (disabling tests rather than bundling the necessary postgresql-test-rpm-macros file needed)
Thank you for the PRs. I've merged the simpler alternative (PR #9). When the RPM macros are shipped, we can enable it.
(In reply to Ondřej Sloup from comment #5) > Thank you for the PRs. I've merged the simpler alternative (PR #9). When the > RPM macros are shipped, we can enable it. Hi Ondřej, With PR#9 (thanks for merging!) the package can be built on EPEL 9 already, since tests are disabled so the missing test dependency does not have to be installed. Can this be branched and built for EPEL 9? Scratch build - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116792203 succeeded just fine now that the PR is merged. Or as noted above, I'm happy to maintain it in EPEL (FAS: salimma) -- and the epel-packagers-sig group too; see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/#epel_packagers_sig_members If you just grant us collaborator access on epel*, you won't have to worry about any unreviewed commits landing in the Fedora branches.
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e9e42cffe7 (python-psycopg3-3.1.18-4.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e9e42cffe7
(In reply to Michel Lind from comment #6) > Hi Ondřej, > > With PR#9 (thanks for merging!) the package can be built on EPEL 9 already, > since tests are disabled so the missing test dependency does not have to be > installed. > > Can this be branched and built for EPEL 9? Scratch build - > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116792203 succeeded just > fine now that the PR is merged. > Just noticed it's actually built... but not pushed to Bodhi. I've just done that - thanks for building it!
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-e9e42cffe7 (python-psycopg3-3.1.18-4.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.