Bug 2274747 - Review Request: tinyfiledialogs- C library for portable file dialogs
Summary: Review Request: tinyfiledialogs- C library for portable file dialogs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-12 16:51 UTC by Manish Tiwari
Modified: 2025-11-20 15:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-11-20 15:31:41 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Manish Tiwari 2024-04-12 16:51:05 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/matiwari/tinyfiledialogs/fedora-40-x86_64/07297699-tinyfiledialogs/tinyfiledialogs.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/matiwari/tinyfiledialogs/fedora-40-x86_64/07297699-tinyfiledialogs/tinyfiledialogs-3.17.5-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description: tinyfiledialogs is a cross-platform C/C++ library for displaying simple dialogs, such as file open, file save, and message boxes, in desktop applications.

Fedora Account System Username: matiwari

Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116271106

Comment 1 Manish Tiwari 2024-05-10 17:48:25 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/matiwari/tinyfiledialogs/fedora-40-x86_64/07434817-tinyfiledialogs/tinyfiledialogs.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/matiwari/tinyfiledialogs/fedora-40-x86_64/07434817-tinyfiledialogs/tinyfiledialogs-3.18.1-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description: tinyfiledialogs is a cross-platform C/C++ library for displaying simple dialogs, such as file open, file save, and message boxes, in desktop applications.

Fedora Account System Username: matiwari

Koji Scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=117522407

Updated to newest version

Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2024-06-03 12:48:02 UTC
1) gcc command should be used with macro and not explicit list of compile flags. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_compiler_flags
and https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/RPMMacros/#_macros_providing_compiler_and_linker_flags

2) if package is providing header files then it should go to separate package. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages

3) when installing files, timestamp should be preserved. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_timestamps

4) License text for Zlib is not present in source archive. Ask upstream to add Zlib license text in upstream as a separate file.

5) library file libtinyfd.so should be handled properly for installation see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages

6) don't use strip and debug_package macro

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-06-04 00:45:30 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems
that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please
respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the
submitter to proceed with the review.

If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the
fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take
this ticket.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted.

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:44:13 UTC
Hello,
I do realize that this is possibly an old ticket. I am sorry that it hasn't been
reviewed yet. Let me trigger the Fedora Review Service to see if the package
builds successfully. Hopefully, a green check mark will attract some reviewer.

If I am resurrecting an old ticket that you are not interested in anymore, my
apologies, feel free to close it.

[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-20 14:44:34 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:

    Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>

Found:

    Review Request: tinyfiledialogs- C library for portable file dialogs

As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.