Bug 2275321 - Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for python-dateutil
Summary: Review Request: python-types-python-dateutil - Typing stubs for python-dateutil
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-16 16:51 UTC by Brendan Pham
Modified: 2025-05-18 00:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-05-18 00:45:29 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Brendan Pham 2024-04-16 16:51:24 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/timarthurlee/uml-redhat-capstone-2023/blob/main/rpmbuild/SPECS/types-python-dateutil.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/timarthurlee/uml-redhat-capstone-2023/blob/main/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-types-python-dateutil-2.9.0.20240316-1.fc39.src.rpm
Description: "types-python-dateutil" offers type hints for the functions and classes in the widely-used "python-dateutil" library, improving code readability and enabling better static analysis for Python projects involving date and time operations.
Fedora Account System Username: brendanpham
This is my first package, I am submitting this as apart of the 2023 Friendly Fedora capstone project team at UMASS Lowell

The rpm was sucessfully built in koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116461559

Comment 1 Brendan Pham 2024-04-16 17:07:06 UTC
Fixed Spec Link to the correct spec file.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-04-17 00:45:25 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-05-18 00:45:29 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.