Bug 2276028 - ODF client operator has nondescript information on the operator hub
Summary: ODF client operator has nondescript information on the operator hub
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-client-operator
Version: 4.16
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.16.0
Assignee: Leela Venkaiah Gangavarapu
QA Contact: Jilju Joy
URL:
Whiteboard: isf-provider
: 2275958 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 2278843
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-04-19 05:24 UTC by Jilju Joy
Modified: 2024-09-13 02:48 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.16.0-118
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 2267712
: 2278843 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-07-17 13:19:54 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
odf client description - fix (342.76 KB, image/jpeg)
2024-06-03 13:50 UTC, Daniel Osypenko
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage ocs-client-operator pull 158 0 None open bundle: update csv with info required for release 2024-05-27 10:52:34 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-client-operator pull 163 0 None open Bug 2276028: [release-4.16] api: add a license file (Apache 2.0) 2024-05-28 05:07:50 UTC
Github red-hat-storage ocs-client-operator pull 164 0 None open Bug 2276028: [release-4.16] bundle: update csv with info required for release 2024-05-29 15:09:48 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:4591 0 None None None 2024-07-17 13:19:57 UTC

Description Jilju Joy 2024-04-19 05:24:51 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2267712 +++

Description of problem:

With OCP 4.15 GA, the Operator Hub lists the 'OpenShift Data Foundation Client' operator as requested in bug 2262376, but the information for the operator is nondescript - 'foo'. See attached screenshot

It should be replaced with something like:
"This operator is not intended to be directly installed"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OCP 4.15 GA

--- Additional comment from RHEL Program Management on 2024-03-04 15:50:37 UTC ---

This bug having no release flag set previously, is now set with release flag 'odf‑4.15.0' to '?', and so is being proposed to be fixed at the ODF 4.15.0 release. Note that the 3 Acks (pm_ack, devel_ack, qa_ack), if any previously set while release flag was missing, have now been reset since the Acks are to be set against a release flag.

--- Additional comment from Madhu Rajanna on 2024-03-04 15:57:34 UTC ---

Need change at  https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-client-operator/blob/09ed5addd2f789ea17ddb0[…]/manifests/bases/ocs-client-operator.clusterserviceversion.yaml, This is present from Day 1 nothing changed recently

--- Additional comment from Mudit Agarwal on 2024-03-05 08:03:56 UTC ---

Not a 4.15 release blocker

--- Additional comment from RHEL Program Management on 2024-03-05 09:00:41 UTC ---

This BZ is being approved for ODF 4.15.0 release, upon receipt of the 3 ACKs (PM,Devel,QA) for the release flag 'odf‑4.15.0

--- Additional comment from RHEL Program Management on 2024-03-05 09:00:41 UTC ---

Since this bug has been approved for ODF 4.15.0 release, through release flag 'odf-4.15.0+', the Target Release is being set to 'ODF 4.15.0

--- Additional comment from Jilju Joy on 2024-03-05 10:44:06 UTC ---

Do we need a different description for the operator other than the one suggested in comment #0 ? Asking because the client cluster in provider-client configuration can make use of UI to install the operator.

--- Additional comment from Jilju Joy on 2024-03-05 11:24:31 UTC ---

(In reply to Jilju Joy from comment #6)
> Do we need a different description for the operator other than the one
> suggested in comment #0 ? Asking because the client cluster in
> provider-client configuration can make use of UI to install the operator.

Removing needinfo as this got clarified.

--- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2024-03-06 05:10:06 UTC ---

This bug has been added to advisory RHSA-2023:118688 by Deepshikha Khandelwal (dkhandel)

--- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2024-03-06 05:10:22 UTC ---

Bug report changed to ON_QA status by Errata System.
A QE request has been submitted for advisory RHSA-2023:118688-01
https://errata.engineering.redhat.com/advisory/118688

--- Additional comment from Jilju Joy on 2024-03-07 09:11:34 UTC ---

Verified in 4.15.0-157.
OpenShift Data Foundation Client in OperatorHub page is showing correct description. Screenshot attached.

--- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2024-03-19 15:33:18 UTC ---

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.15.0 security, enhancement, & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1383

Comment 6 Mudit Agarwal 2024-05-07 05:16:02 UTC
Leela, what's the plan for this bug. We are one week away from Dev freeze.

Comment 7 Leela Venkaiah Gangavarapu 2024-05-07 06:34:02 UTC
Marked the BZs dependency appropriately, we are pending on Docs team to have the content and then I'll raise the PR. We are following up in slack and will add comment if there are any updates.

Comment 8 Daniel Osypenko 2024-05-09 08:43:20 UTC
this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275958

Comment 11 Daniel Osypenko 2024-06-03 13:49:17 UTC
Now we have a text: OpenShift Data Foundation client operator enables consumption of storage services from a remote centralized OpenShift Data Foundation provider cluster.
ODF 4.16.0-118.stable
adding screenshot

Comment 12 Daniel Osypenko 2024-06-03 13:50:02 UTC
Created attachment 2036153 [details]
odf client description - fix

Comment 13 Sunil Kumar Acharya 2024-06-06 07:34:46 UTC
Please update the RDT flag/text appropriately.

Comment 14 Sunil Kumar Acharya 2024-06-18 06:45:26 UTC
Please update the RDT flag/text appropriately.

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2024-07-17 13:19:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.16.0 security, enhancement & bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4591


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.