Bug 227719 - Review Request: gpixpod - An ipod photo organizer
Review Request: gpixpod - An ipod photo organizer
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Parag AN(पराग)
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-07 13:55 EST by Deji Akingunola
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-13 17:28:38 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
notting: fedora‑cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Deji Akingunola 2007-02-07 13:55:31 EST
Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gpixpod/gpixpod.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gpixpod/gpixpod-0.6.2-1.src.rpm
Description: 
GPixPod let you manage your collection of photos uploading
them to your iPod, organizing them in photo albums.
Instead of the iTunes synchronization approach, GPixPod 
let you choose your manual operations on your photos and
photo albums, such as adding/deleting individual photos
and photo albums, and renaming photo albums
Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-02-08 09:20:15 EST
mock build is fine
rpmlint  is silent.
will review tomorrow
Comment 2 Parag AN(पराग) 2007-02-08 23:51:32 EST
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMS.
+ source files match upstream.
2136a65e7b72ba5f5cd7ae5ebdc2205c  gpixpod-0.6.2.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop files installed correctly.
+ python guidelines followed.
+ GUI app.

APPROVED.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.