+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2243801 +++

Description of problem:
ImageMagick rpm package needs rebuilding due to new LibRaw in CentOS 9 Stream.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to update CentOS 9 Stream with ImageMagick package installed. 
2. 
3.

Actual results:
dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 0:19:16 ago on Fri 13 Oct 2023 09:13:09 AM CEST.
Error: 
 Problem: package ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64 from @System requires libraw_r.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-4.el9.x86_64 from appstream
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-5.el9.x86_64 from appstream
  - cannot install both LibRaw-0.21.1-1.el9.x86_64 from appstream and LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64 from appstream
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package LibRaw-0.20.2-6.el9.x86_64
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-1.el9.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)


Expected results:
ImageMagick package updated.

Additional info:
After excluging LibRaw during dnf update it is updating well. 

thank You

--- Additional comment from Debarshi Ray on 2023-10-19 13:34:14 UTC ---

We need an epel9-next branch to rebuild ImageMagick against the new LibRaw-0.21.1 in CentOS Stream 9.  The existing epel9 branch isn't enough because it only builds against already released RHEL 9.x versions.

The branch needs to be requested by the ImageMagick package maintainer.  I can't create it:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/57370

--- Additional comment from Sergio Basto on 2023-10-19 15:54:27 UTC ---

Thanks for the reminder , building it now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107775776

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-10-19 17:25:00 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-7a225ca112 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9 Next. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-7a225ca112

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-10-20 02:25:51 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-7a225ca112 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 Next testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-7a225ca112

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

--- Additional comment from Łukasz Posadowski on 2023-10-25 05:11:56 UTC ---

I tried it this way:

# rpm --nodeps -Uvh https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ImageMagick/6.9.12.93/2.el9.next/x86_64/ImageMagick-libs-6.9.12.93-2.el9.next.x86_64.rpm
# dnf update

I can confirm, everything is working well. Thank You.

--- Additional comment from Fedora Update System on 2023-10-27 02:19:09 UTC ---

FEDORA-EPEL-NEXT-2023-7a225ca112 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 Next stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.