Bug 2279495 - Review Request: kfreestyle2d - Unofficial Kinesis Freestyle 2 Userspace Linux Driver
Summary: Review Request: kfreestyle2d - Unofficial Kinesis Freestyle 2 Userspace Linux...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-05-07 07:19 UTC by Aurelien Bompard
Modified: 2025-10-18 08:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7422802 to 7435494 (686 bytes, patch)
2024-05-11 08:30 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7435494 to 8010405 (408 bytes, patch)
2024-09-12 00:27 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8010405 to 8151904 (1.03 KB, patch)
2024-10-17 14:57 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Aurelien Bompard 2024-05-07 07:19:22 UTC
Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/misc/kfreestyle2d/kfreestyle2d.spec
SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/misc/kfreestyle2d/kfreestyle2d-0-1.20240420git930dacf.fc40.src.rpm
Description:
The Kinesis Freestyle 2 keyboard is a fantastic split keyboard for people who don't want RSI in their wrists. It has four multimedia keys on F8-F11 that do not work in Linux. This is a simple program that enables those keys.
Fedora Account System Username: abompard

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-07 07:21:40 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7422802
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279495-kfreestyle2d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07422802-kfreestyle2d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-11 08:30:56 UTC
Created attachment 2032649 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7422802 to 7435494

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-11 08:30:58 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7435494
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279495-kfreestyle2d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07435494-kfreestyle2d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Michal Konecny 2024-09-10 15:03:29 UTC
When trying to layer it on Fedora Silverblue 40 I encountered following during the post script:
`zlopez-workstation rpm-ostree(kfreestyle2d.post)[46280]: Failed to send reload request: No such file or directory`

Comment 7 Aurelien Bompard 2024-09-10 15:47:30 UTC
Weird, the RPM runs `udevadm control --reload`, I tried running that on a Silverblue host I have at home and it worked. Is systemd-udevd running on your host? Is "sudo udevadm control --ping" exiting with code 0?

Comment 8 Michal Konecny 2024-09-11 11:38:41 UTC
I can confirm that `sudo udevadm control --ping` is returning 0, but `sudo udevadm control --reload` is returning `Failed to send reload request: Permission denied`. Maybe some permissions on my system are wrong.

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-12 00:27:52 UTC
Created attachment 2046434 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7435494 to 8010405

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-12 00:27:55 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8010405
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279495-kfreestyle2d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08010405-kfreestyle2d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2024-10-17 14:57:47 UTC
Created attachment 2052537 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8010405 to 8151904

Comment 13 Fedora Review Service 2024-10-17 14:57:49 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8151904
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279495-kfreestyle2d/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08151904-kfreestyle2d/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 14 Package Review 2025-10-18 00:45:20 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 15 Aurelien Bompard 2025-10-18 08:53:03 UTC
Still interested!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.