python-astunparse fails to build with Python 3.13.0b1.

42 tests fail with different values of the asserted objects. For example:

======================================================================
FAIL: test_with_simple (tests.test_dump.DumpTestCase.test_with_simple)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/common.py", line 403, in test_with_simple
    self.check_roundtrip(with_simple)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/test_dump.py", line 24, in check_roundtrip
    self.assertASTEqual(dump1, dump2)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/test_dump.py", line 18, in assertASTEqual
    self.assertEqual(dump1, dump2)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: "Modu[72 chars]ad()), args=[], keywords=[]))], body=[Expr(val[50 chars]=[])" != "Modu[72 chars]ad())))], body=[Expr(value=Name(id='suite1', ctx=Load()))])])"
- Module(body=[With(items=[withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='f', ctx=Load()), args=[], keywords=[]))], body=[Expr(value=Name(id='suite1', ctx=Load()))])], type_ignores=[])
?                                                                                  ----------------------                                                       -----------------
+ Module(body=[With(items=[withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='f', ctx=Load())))], body=[Expr(value=Name(id='suite1', ctx=Load()))])])


======================================================================
FAIL: test_with_two_items (tests.test_dump.DumpTestCase.test_with_two_items)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/common.py", line 410, in test_with_two_items
    self.check_roundtrip(with_two_items)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/test_dump.py", line 24, in check_roundtrip
    self.assertASTEqual(dump1, dump2)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/astunparse-1.6.3/tests/test_dump.py", line 18, in assertASTEqual
    self.assertEqual(dump1, dump2)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: "Modu[72 chars]ad()), args=[], keywords=[]), optional_vars=Na[214 chars]=[])" != "Modu[72 chars]ad())), optional_vars=Name(id='x', ctx=Store()[153 chars]])])"
- Module(body=[With(items=[withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='f', ctx=Load()), args=[], keywords=[]), optional_vars=Name(id='x', ctx=Store())), withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='g', ctx=Load()), args=[], keywords=[]), optional_vars=Name(id='y', ctx=Store()))], body=[Expr(value=Name(id='suite1', ctx=Load()))])], type_ignores=[])
+ Module(body=[With(items=[withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='f', ctx=Load())), optional_vars=Name(id='x', ctx=Store())), withitem(context_expr=Call(func=Name(id='g', ctx=Load())), optional_vars=Name(id='y', ctx=Store()))], body=[Expr(value=Name(id='suite1', ctx=Load()))])])


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 94 tests in 0.057s

FAILED (failures=42, skipped=8)

https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html

For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07433964-python-astunparse/

For all our attempts to build python-astunparse with Python 3.13, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/python-astunparse/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.

We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.