Bug 2280171 - Review Request: mpc-qt - A clone of Media Player Classic reimplemented in Qt
Summary: Review Request: mpc-qt - A clone of Media Player Classic reimplemented in Qt
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://mpc-qt.github.io/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: MultimediaSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-05-12 21:56 UTC by Yaakov Selkowitz
Modified: 2024-05-23 01:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-05-23 01:08:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
dominik: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7437545 to 7440189 (678 bytes, patch)
2024-05-13 12:28 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2024-05-12 21:56:10 UTC
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/mpc-qt.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc41.src.rpm
Description: Media Player Classic Qute Theater (mpc-qt) aims to reproduce most of the 
interface and functionality of Media Player Classic Home Cinema (mpc-hc).
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-13 09:02:21 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7437545
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2280171-mpc-qt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07437545-mpc-qt/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2024-05-13 09:56:07 UTC
I suggest replacing all calls to `rm -f` with `rm -v` so that they fail when upstream (re)moves the affected files or directories instead of succeeding silently.

Two files seem to have a different license (https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2280171-mpc-qt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07437545-mpc-qt/fedora-review/licensecheck.txt):

BSD 3-Clause License
--------------------
mpc-qt-23.12/lconvert.pri

ISC License
-----------
mpc-qt-23.12/qthelper.hpp

Other than that, it looks fine.

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2024-05-13 12:19:16 UTC
lconvert.pri is part of the build infrastructure, so its license need not be tagged.  ISC was indeed missing though.

Comment 4 Yaakov Selkowitz 2024-05-13 12:19:38 UTC
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/mpc-qt.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc41.src.rpm
Description: Media Player Classic Qute Theater (mpc-qt) aims to reproduce most of the 
interface and functionality of Media Player Classic Home Cinema (mpc-hc).
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-13 12:28:58 UTC
Created attachment 2032912 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7437545 to 7440189

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2024-05-13 12:29:01 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7440189
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2280171-mpc-qt/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07440189-mpc-qt/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2024-05-14 11:13:16 UTC
NOTE: The only issue I could find is the missing separate ISC license text and that's not a blocker.

So, APPROVED.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
     Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
     found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/applications, /usr/lib, /usr/share,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps,
     /usr/src/debug, /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/icons, /usr/share/doc,
     /usr/bin, /usr/src, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr,
     /usr/share/metainfo
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/src,
     /usr/share/applications, /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr/lib,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/src/debug,
     /usr/share/licenses, /usr, /usr/share/icons, /usr/share/doc,
     /usr/share, /usr/share/metainfo, /usr/bin
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 12989 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          mpc-qt-debuginfo-23.12-4.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          mpc-qt-debugsource-23.12-4.fc41.x86_64.rpm
          mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc41.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5rjzvejd')]
checks: 32, packages: 4

mpc-qt.src: E: spelling-error ('reimplemented', 'Summary(en_US) reimplemented -> re implemented, re-implemented, implemented')
mpc-qt.src: E: spelling-error ('hc', '%description -l en_US hc -> ch, h, c')
mpc-qt.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('reimplemented', 'Summary(en_US) reimplemented -> re implemented, re-implemented, implemented')
mpc-qt.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('hc', '%description -l en_US hc -> ch, h, c')
mpc-qt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpc-qt
 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 16 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.6 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: mpc-qt-debuginfo-23.12-4.fc41.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp2edsnvic')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "mpc-qt-debuginfo".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "mpc-qt".
(none): E: there is no installed rpm "mpc-qt-debugsource".
There are no files to process nor additional arguments.
Nothing to do, aborting.
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3

 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/mpc-qt/mpc-qt/archive/v23.12/mpc-qt-23.12.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 6a639bc7911a8972cb7d7e207d3cb24606d2439af2665c373745ae8a6ced65be
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6a639bc7911a8972cb7d7e207d3cb24606d2439af2665c373745ae8a6ced65be


Requires
--------
mpc-qt (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    hicolor-icon-theme
    libGLX.so.0()(64bit)
    libQt6Core.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.7)(64bit)
    libQt6DBus.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6DBus.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libQt6Gui.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6Gui.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libQt6Network.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6Network.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libQt6OpenGLWidgets.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6OpenGLWidgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libQt6Widgets.so.6()(64bit)
    libQt6Widgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libmpv.so.2()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

mpc-qt-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

mpc-qt-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
mpc-qt:
    application()
    application(mpc-qt.desktop)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(io.github.mpc_qt.Mpc-Qt.appdata.xml)
    mimehandler(application/ogg)
    mimehandler(application/sdp)
    mimehandler(application/smil)
    mimehandler(application/streamingmedia)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.rn-realmedia)
    mimehandler(application/vnd.rn-realmedia-vbr)
    mimehandler(application/x-ogg)
    mimehandler(application/x-smil)
    mimehandler(application/x-streamingmedia)
    mimehandler(audio/AMR)
    mimehandler(audio/aac)
    mimehandler(audio/ac3)
    mimehandler(audio/flac)
    mimehandler(audio/m4a)
    mimehandler(audio/mp1)
    mimehandler(audio/mp2)
    mimehandler(audio/mp3)
    mimehandler(audio/mp4)
    mimehandler(audio/mpeg)
    mimehandler(audio/mpegurl)
    mimehandler(audio/mpg)
    mimehandler(audio/ogg)
    mimehandler(audio/rn-mpeg)
    mimehandler(audio/scpls)
    mimehandler(audio/vnd.rn-realaudio)
    mimehandler(audio/wav)
    mimehandler(audio/x-aac)
    mimehandler(audio/x-ape)
    mimehandler(audio/x-flac)
    mimehandler(audio/x-m4a)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mp1)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mp2)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mp3)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mpeg)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mpegurl)
    mimehandler(audio/x-mpg)
    mimehandler(audio/x-ms-wma)
    mimehandler(audio/x-pls)
    mimehandler(audio/x-pn-realaudio)
    mimehandler(audio/x-pn-windows-pcm)
    mimehandler(audio/x-realaudio)
    mimehandler(audio/x-scpls)
    mimehandler(audio/x-shorten)
    mimehandler(audio/x-tta)
    mimehandler(audio/x-vorbis+ogg)
    mimehandler(audio/x-wav)
    mimehandler(audio/x-wavpack)
    mimehandler(inode/directory)
    mimehandler(video/mp2t)
    mimehandler(video/mp4)
    mimehandler(video/mpeg)
    mimehandler(video/msvideo)
    mimehandler(video/ogg)
    mimehandler(video/quicktime)
    mimehandler(video/vnd.rn-realvideo)
    mimehandler(video/webm)
    mimehandler(video/x-avi)
    mimehandler(video/x-fli)
    mimehandler(video/x-flv)
    mimehandler(video/x-matroska)
    mimehandler(video/x-mpeg)
    mimehandler(video/x-mpeg2)
    mimehandler(video/x-ms-afs)
    mimehandler(video/x-ms-asf)
    mimehandler(video/x-ms-wmv)
    mimehandler(video/x-ms-wmx)
    mimehandler(video/x-ms-wvxvideo)
    mimehandler(video/x-msvideo)
    mimehandler(video/x-ogm+ogg)
    mimehandler(video/x-theora)
    mpc-qt
    mpc-qt(x86-64)

mpc-qt-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    mpc-qt-debuginfo
    mpc-qt-debuginfo(x86-64)

mpc-qt-debugsource:
    mpc-qt-debugsource
    mpc-qt-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name mpc-qt --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, fonts, SugarActivity, Haskell, Python, Java
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 8 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-05-14 14:48:49 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpc-qt

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2024-05-14 15:29:44 UTC
FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3 (mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2024-05-14 15:42:52 UTC
FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f (mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc39) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2024-05-14 15:51:59 UTC
FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-c410386b67 (mpc-qt-flatpak-23.12-1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40 Flatpaks.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-c410386b67

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2024-05-15 14:53:59 UTC
FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2024-05-15 16:16:37 UTC
FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2024-05-15 16:31:25 UTC
FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-c410386b67 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 Flatpaks testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-c410386b67

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2024-05-23 01:08:40 UTC
FEDORA-2024-07c01f29e3 (mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2024-05-23 01:13:53 UTC
FEDORA-2024-a45737a02f (mpc-qt-23.12-4.fc39) has been pushed to the Fedora 39 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2024-05-23 01:22:42 UTC
FEDORA-FLATPAK-2024-c410386b67 (mpc-qt-flatpak-23.12-1) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 Flatpaks stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.