Bug 228279 - Review Request: hunspell-bg - Bulgarian hunspell dictionary
Review Request: hunspell-bg - Bulgarian hunspell dictionary
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: manuel wolfshant
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-02-12 09:18 EST by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-14 04:41:17 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wolfy: fedora‑review+
notting: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-12 09:18:10 EST
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-bg.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-bg-0.20040405-1.src.rpm
Description: Bulgarian hunspell dictionary

1) http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries#Bulgarian_.28Bulgaria.29
2) GPL
3) splits this dictionary out of OOo to becomes a standalone package which can be independently updated and reused by other applications, e.g. firefox when it moves to hunspell

very similar to #227811
Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-12 10:30:21 EST
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 949cff5c527a1dd8c0ec4b6035a34a50e81ec7af 
- the package builds in mock, devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag seems identical to the one included (in
Bulgarian..) in the sources
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint is silent on both source and binary rpm
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 2.5K text file
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-02-13 00:56:03 EST
Well, for now, until new review process makes clear,
please mark the reviewer as assigner as before (not
merge review).
Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 04:41:17 EST
 27537 (hunspell-bg): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.