Bug 2284088 - Directories are missing in RPM database.
Summary: Directories are missing in RPM database.
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qmapshack
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Horák
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-05-31 05:53 UTC by Christoph Karl
Modified: 2025-05-04 04:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Christoph Karl 2024-05-31 05:53:16 UTC
The following directories are missing in RPM database:
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/42x42
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/42x42/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/8x8
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/8x8/apps
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/80x80
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/80x80/apps


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpm -qf /usr/share/icons/hicolor/42x42/
file /usr/share/icons/hicolor/42x42 is not owned by any package

Actual Results:  
not owned by any package

Expected Results:  
Either
qmaptool-1.17.1-4.fc40.x86_64
or
qmapshack-1.17.1-4.fc40.x86_64

Comment 1 Dan Horák 2024-05-31 08:24:41 UTC
Thanks for the report, I think those are some non-standard sizes, because otherwise the would be owner by the hicolor-icon-theme package. I think the options are in the order of preference:
- ask hicolor-icon-theme to own the new dirs
- don't package the non-standard sized icons in qmapshack
- include the dirs with qmapshack

And it seems there is a similar problem with scribus, it uses /usr/share/icons/hicolor/1024x1024, but nothing owns it.

Comment 2 Christoph Karl 2024-05-31 08:37:30 UTC
Thank you for answering.
I am not sure about "ask hicolor-icon-theme to own the new dirs".
I don't think they will provide all possible non-standard sizes.

But maybe it makes sense to define/declare a set of standard sizes other packages can count on.
I think about asking on the devel list.

Comment 3 Aoife Moloney 2025-04-25 10:53:28 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 40 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 40 on 2025-05-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '40'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 40 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 4 Christoph Karl 2025-05-04 04:51:56 UTC
Solution still missing


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.