Bug 228433 - perl-version: EPEL branch?
Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-version (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-13 05:01 UTC by Chris Weyl
Modified: 2011-02-02 22:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-07-03 17:54:17 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
notting: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:01:05 UTC 
A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4.  Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)

(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)
Comment 1 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:11:48 UTC 
Erm, scratch that last bit.  The spec does indeed build via Makefile.PL.
Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 05:51:38 UTC 
...and to build on that, it would appear that since the spec is using
Makefile.PL to build, the buildreq on perl(Module::Build) >= 0.2611 is spurious.
 perl-version builds nicely in mock with that br removed and without other
alterations.
Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-04-04 23:04:20 UTC 
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: tcallawa@redhat.com
Updated EPEL CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com
Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2007-04-06 05:59:06 UTC 
added
Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-07-03 17:54:17 UTC 
Built. Sorry it took so long. :/
Comment 6 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 08:27:30 UTC 
We resurrected this package for dual-life modules. Could it be brought to life again? It's already unblocked, but now we are missing permissions.

Spot, if you like, add yourself among maintainers.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14 EL-6
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig
Comment 7 Paul Howarth 2011-01-31 10:00:09 UTC 
I don't think we can add an EL-6 branch as that would update a package from RHEL-6.
Comment 8 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 10:45:27 UTC 
You are right.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig
Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2011-02-02 22:28:33 UTC 
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.