Bug 228433 – perl-version: EPEL branch?

Bug 228433 - perl-version: EPEL branch?

Summary:	perl-version: EPEL branch?

Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	perl-version (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-02-13 00:01 EST by Chris Weyl
Modified:	2011-02-02 17:28 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-07-03 13:54:17 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Flags:	notting: fedora‑cvs+

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 00:01:05 EST

A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4.  Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)

(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)

Comment 1 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 00:11:48 EST

Erm, scratch that last bit.  The spec does indeed build via Makefile.PL.

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2007-02-13 00:51:38 EST

...and to build on that, it would appear that since the spec is using
Makefile.PL to build, the buildreq on perl(Module::Build) >= 0.2611 is spurious.
 perl-version builds nicely in mock with that br removed and without other
alterations.

Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-04-04 19:04:20 EDT

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
Updated EPEL Owners: tcallawa@redhat.com
Updated EPEL CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2007-04-06 01:59:06 EDT

added

Comment 5 Tom "spot" Callaway 2007-07-03 13:54:17 EDT

Built. Sorry it took so long. :/

Comment 6 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 03:27:30 EST

We resurrected this package for dual-life modules. Could it be brought to life again? It's already unblocked, but now we are missing permissions.

Spot, if you like, add yourself among maintainers.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14 EL-6
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 7 Paul Howarth 2011-01-31 05:00:09 EST

I don't think we can add an EL-6 branch as that would update a package from RHEL-6.

Comment 8 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-01-31 05:45:27 EST

You are right.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-version
New Branches: f14
Owners: mmaslano ppisar psabata
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 9 Bill Nottingham 2011-02-02 17:28:33 EST

Git done (by process-git-requests).

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.