Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (python-logdetective) Fails To Install in Fedora 41: can't install python3-logdetective: - nothing provides (python3.12dist(tiktoken) < 0.7~~ with python3.12dist(tiktoken) >= 0.6) needed by python3-logdetective-0.2.0-1.fc41.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-41-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-logdetective P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tiktoken/c/66a5632ba66ed27b6d1d633592724d6be612d638?branch=rawhide was pushed by a provenpackager with no coordination whatsoever. Peter, please don't do that. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ """ Prior to making changes, provenpackagers should try to communicate with owners of a package in bugzilla, dist-git pull request, IRC, matrix, or email. """
I'm the main admin of python-tiktoken and I don't like the fact that the change was pushed without me knowing about it and it broke another package. The commit message doesn't contain any explanation of why the update was needed. The logdetective is the only package requiring tiktoken so this change actually broke the main purpose of tiktoken in Fedora. Peter, could you please explain why you used your provenpackager rights for this?
In the meantime, about fixing this. Upstream seems to have decided to use poetry, which encourages aggressive dependency version pinning: https://github.com/fedora-copr/logdetective/blob/logdetective-0.2.0/pyproject.toml#L29 A PR like this one might be needed https://github.com/fedora-copr/logdetective/pull/27 (and perhaps we should ask upstream to relax all the dependencies, as this will also be problem with requests etc.)
I opened https://github.com/fedora-copr/logdetective/pull/31
Even better.
> The logdetective is the only package requiring tiktoken so this change > actually broke the main purpose of tiktoken in Fedora. > > Peter, could you please explain why you used your provenpackager rights for > this? I couldn't see anything in Fedora needing tiktoken, in hindsight I think I screwed up my dnf query against rawhide and I suspect it ran against f40 (I don't have the history anymore to verify). I need the newer version for some packaging I am doing in rawhide and the changelog [1] didn't indicate major changes, just appeared to be a standard bump feat/perf, I also checked for new version bugs as some maintainers often leave them open and link against other issues to indicate reasons for not bumping packages. I apologise for the oversight and breakage. [1] https://github.com/openai/tiktoken/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
> The logdetective is the only package requiring tiktoken so this change > actually broke the main purpose of tiktoken in Fedora. Given with Miroslav's PR in comment #4 it's no longer a dependency of logdetective if you don't wish to maintain it anymore I don't mind taking it over as I have a need for it.
@pbrobinson I want to remind https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages/#digest and https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ Rebuilding a new version (of tiktoken) does not fit any case. I appreciate being active in this, but submitting PR and waiting at least one day is more respectful to the maintainers. The PR on logdetective was just merged. I expect the new release to be done in a few days. Feel free to ignore this breakage. I will close this bug when I submit new release.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions: - Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository. (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.) or - Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet. or - Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it. If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs will continue. This package may be orphaned in 7+ weeks. This is the first reminder (step 3) from the policy. Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 41. Thanks for taking care of it!