Bug 228475 - Review Request: hunspell-fr - French hunspell dictionaries
Review Request: hunspell-fr - French hunspell dictionaries
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: manuel wolfshant
Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-02-13 05:03 EST by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-20 04:28:11 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wolfy: fedora‑review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 05:03:47 EST
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fr.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fr-0.20060915-1.src.rpm
Description: French hunspell dictionaries

Similar to 227811
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 09:39:02 EST
Any progress on this review, I believe it's the last of the hunspell dictionary
Comment 2 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-14 09:44:54 EST
Xavier has assigned it to himself for review and I do not think it would be
polite from m part to step on his shoes.
Comment 3 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-15 10:10:18 EST
taking over the review in order to finish with all the set.


- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
1591bf44789a78fda5d84c5820fecb87e19efb27 fr_FR-1990.zip
- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site says and is
included in the package
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output is silent
- code, not content
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-20 04:28:11 EST
 27896 (hunspell-fr): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.