Bug 228479 - Review Request: hunspell-hr - Croatian hunspell dictionaries
Review Request: hunspell-hr - Croatian hunspell dictionaries
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: manuel wolfshant
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-02-13 05:35 EST by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-15 03:58:41 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wolfy: fedora‑review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 05:35:55 EST
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hr.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hr-0.20060607-1.src.rpm
Description: Croatian hunspell dictionaries


Similar to 227811
Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-13 18:17:02 EST
GOOD

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
60fa001543ab9e67f20fcc68c358c62f81e006ac  hr_HR.zip
- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license LGPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site says
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output is silent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc is just a 2 liner specifying that the
license is dual, LGPL/SISSL
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED

SHOULD: please ask upstream to include the actual license file in the archive
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-15 03:58:41 EST
 27627 (hunspell-hr): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.