Bug 228490 - Review Request: hunspell-nl - Dutch hunspell dictionaries
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-nl - Dutch hunspell dictionaries
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2007-02-13 11:42 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2007-02-15 16:29:34 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
wolfy: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 11:42:46 UTC
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-nl.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-nl-0.20050617-1.src.rpm
Description: Dutch hunspell dictionaries

Similar to 227811

Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-14 00:25:11 UTC
upstreamid is wrong, should be 20-Jul-2005 (archive date) or 17/19-Jul-2005
(files' date)


- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
9f5432aeb20ab7e9a3c72877b71056a33b2bd9ba  nl_NL.zip
- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only 3 text files)
- the license GPL stated in the tag is the same as the web site and the included
documentation say; it is not included in the package because upstream did not
include it either
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output is silent
- code, not content
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED but please fix the version before uploading to CVS; you should also ask
upstream to include the GPL license in the archive

Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 08:45:40 UTC
updated wiki http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries to match .zip
date and updated
to match

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-15 16:29:34 UTC
 27657 (hunspell-nl): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.