Bug 228508 - Hash terminology
Hash terminology
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhel-sag (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ryan Lerch
Andrew Ross
: Documentation
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-02-13 08:37 EST by PSV Davey
Modified: 2013-10-20 18:05 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2010-03-30 23:43:29 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description PSV Davey 2007-02-13 08:37:15 EST
Description of problem:
Chapter 1 page two (section 1.3) the hash sign (#) is referred to as a pound
sign.  This is the only instance in this document, but I expect it applies to
many other documents too, as it's a mistake I've often seen.

I expect that it's done in a kind attempt to make things easier for UK keyboard
users, but in fact the UK keyboard *has* a hash on it - it's just on a different
key, and the pound (£) sign (which is of course completely different) just
happens to be a shifted (3), where you'd expect to find a hash symbol on a US
keyboard.  Telling a UK user to use a pound sign actually risks greater confusion.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Don Domingo 2007-03-20 19:34:22 EDT
assigning this to jha@redhat.com
Comment 3 Michael Hideo 2007-07-08 22:18:02 EDT
Pound is the defacto standard in en-US telecomunications. However in an effort
to communicate effectively I have added "(or hash)" to the line for en-UK readers.

Marking as Modified for the next build. 

- Mike
Comment 4 Michael Hideo 2007-10-22 22:52:15 EDT
Removing automation notification
Comment 5 PSV Davey 2008-06-16 05:29:30 EDT

I didn't know about the defacto standard.  Are you sure?  I've observed that the
hash sign is referred to as a pound sign in a lot of Red Hat documentation, but
this is the first time (in a long career) that I've come across it.

I don't know how it could become such a standard.  I know that Americans use the
sign as a abbreviation for "number", and I've always presumed that they refer to
it in speech as either "number" or "hash".  As far as I know it's never, ever,
had anything to do with pounds, except for the circumstance that UK typewriters
traditionally had their pound sign (the real pound sign) above the digit "3",
which is where US keyboards have the hash sign.  It was of course rare until the
eighties for UK typewriters to have a hash symbol at all.

I can't change the entire culture of Red Hat, but I would encourage you at least
to leave out entirely the reference to "pound" in UK documentation.  UK readers
know what a pound sign is, and it's not what you Yanks say it is:)  As a direct
analogy to imagine what it's like to a UK reader, try thinking how confused you
would be if I referred to # as a dollar sign.

Peter Davey
Comment 6 John Ha 2008-07-28 16:42:30 EDT
Re-assigning to new component owner.
Comment 8 Ryan Lerch 2010-03-30 23:33:17 EDT
IMHO, the definition of both terms in this section is sufficient to cover any future confusion.
Comment 9 Andrew Ross 2010-03-30 23:43:29 EDT
In reference to comment #8

"Lines starting with a pound (or hash) sign (#) are treated as comments and are ignored."

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.