Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 product line. The current stable release is 4.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 229000

Summary: ImageMagick SRPM has 2 missing build reqts
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Johnny Hughes <johnny>
Component: ImageMagickAssignee: Norm Murray <nmurray>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1681
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 15:52:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Build Log differences with and without the BuildRequires none

Description Johnny Hughes 2007-02-16 13:26:05 UTC
The RHEL 4 ImageMagick SRPM has 2 missing build reqts. This causes the SRPM to
build improperly when using automatic buildroot generating programs like mock
(or plague, which calls mock).

The missing build requirements are:

xorg-x11-devel
libxml2-devel

The difference in the build logs (with and without the 2 BuildRequires) is attached.

(in the diff, < beginning lines are the good build {with requires installed} ...
> beginning lines is the SRPM built as is in plague/mock)

-----

I understand that the RHEL 4 codebase is probably not going to be changed to add
these requirements.  I put this here as much to be a help to RHEL users who are
trying to rebuild this package as to try to get the hidden build requirements fixed.

-----

Comment 1 Johnny Hughes 2007-02-16 13:26:06 UTC
Created attachment 148192 [details]
Build Log differences with and without the BuildRequires

Comment 2 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 15:52:51 UTC
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.