Bug 2291284 - Review Request: lem - Lem semantic definition language
Summary: Review Request: lem - Lem semantic definition language
Keywords:
Status: RELEASE_PENDING
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nianqing Yao
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/rems-project/%{name}
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-06-11 08:45 UTC by U2FsdGVkX1
Modified: 2025-06-10 10:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
imbearchild: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7639462 to 8988511 (3.02 KB, patch)
2025-05-02 03:25 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description U2FsdGVkX1 2024-06-11 08:45:01 UTC
Spec URL: https://github.com/fedora-sail/lem/blob/master/lem.spec
SRPM URL: https://github.com/fedora-sail/lem
Description: Lem is a tool for lightweight executable mathematics, for writing, managing, and publishing large-scale portable semantic definitions, with export to LaTeX, executable code (currently OCaml) and interactive theorem provers (currently Coq, HOL4, and Isabelle/HOL, though the generated Coq is not necessarily idiomatic). It is also intended as an intermediate language for generating definitions from domain-specific tools, and for porting definitions between interactive theorem proving systems.
Fedora Account System Username: U2FsdGVkX1

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-06-11 08:45:18 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2024-06-21 04:12:43 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7639462
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2291284-lem/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07639462-lem/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- Package has .a files: lem-devel. Does not provide -static: lem-devel.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Nianqing Yao 2025-04-02 02:11:53 UTC
The warning from fedora-review-service can be safely ignored. 

1. Upstream has released the new 2025 version. Please update accordingly.

2. Non-readable files in /usr/share/lem/ were detected. The file mode 
   600 is unusual and should be verified. (rpmlint)

3. Duplicates of files have been found. Please assess if these duplicate
   files are indeed required. (rpmlint)

4. According to the packaging guidelines for OCaml
   (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml),
   files with extensions *.a, *.cmxa, *.cmx, and *.mli must be excluded
   from the main package and moved into the -devel package.

5. Your description lines should not exceed 80 characters. (rpmlint)
   If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines.

Comment 5 U2FsdGVkX1 2025-04-15 11:27:42 UTC
(In reply to Nianqing Yao from comment #4)
> The warning from fedora-review-service can be safely ignored. 
> 
> 1. Upstream has released the new 2025 version. Please update accordingly.
> 
> 2. Non-readable files in /usr/share/lem/ were detected. The file mode 
>    600 is unusual and should be verified. (rpmlint)
> 
> 3. Duplicates of files have been found. Please assess if these duplicate
>    files are indeed required. (rpmlint)
> 
> 4. According to the packaging guidelines for OCaml
>    (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/OCaml),
>    files with extensions *.a, *.cmxa, *.cmx, and *.mli must be excluded
>    from the main package and moved into the -devel package.
> 
> 5. Your description lines should not exceed 80 characters. (rpmlint)
>    If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines.

1. I have updated to the new version.
2. I have fixed this issue.
3. This is expected, or rather, these are prepared for different backends.
4. I have fixed this issue.
5. I have fixed this issue.
Thank you for your review! If possible, could you please check the new version again?

Comment 7 Nianqing Yao 2025-05-02 02:58:52 UTC
Eh, let's try again. [fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-02 03:25:46 UTC
Created attachment 2088076 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 7639462 to 8988511

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-02 03:25:48 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8988511
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2291284-lem/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08988511-lem/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/
- Package has .a files: lem-devel. Does not provide -static: lem-devel.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 10 Nianqing Yao 2025-05-02 03:36:38 UTC
LGTM

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-02 03:36:46 UTC
Hello @U2FsdGVkX1,
since this is your first Fedora package, you need to get sponsored by a package
sponsor before it can be accepted.

A sponsor is an experienced package maintainer who will guide you through
the processes that you will follow and the tools that you will use as a future
maintainer. A sponsor will also be there to answer your questions related to
packaging.

You can find all active sponsors here:
https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/

I created a sponsorship request for you:
https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/717
Please take a look and make sure the information is correct.

Thank you, and best of luck on your packaging journey.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

Comment 12 Richard W.M. Jones 2025-05-02 12:52:01 UTC
I'm supposed to be Songsong's sponsor.

Comment 13 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-06-10 10:55:38 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lem


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.