Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/openjpeg.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/openjpeg-2.5.2-2.fc41.src.rpm Description: C-Library for JPEG 2000 Fedora Account System Username: smani Scratch build: C-Library for JPEG 2000 This is a re-review to rename the package from openjpeg2 to openjpeg.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7671029 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2294380-openjpeg/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07671029-openjpeg/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - mingw32-openjpeg : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/openjpeg-2.5/openjpeg.h mingw32-openjpeg : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/openjpeg-2.5/opj_config.h mingw64-openjpeg : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/openjpeg-2.5/openjpeg.h mingw64-openjpeg : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/openjpeg-2.5/opj_config.h Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages - A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openjpeg Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names - Package has .a files: mingw32-openjpeg, mingw64-openjpeg. Illegal package name: mingw32-openjpeg, mingw64-openjpeg. Does not provide -static: mingw32-openjpeg, mingw64-openjpeg. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - Documentation size is 13807907 bytes in 521 files. Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
(In reply to Fedora Review Service from comment #1) > - Documentation size is 13807907 bytes in 521 files. > Read more: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation the spec is almost equal to openjpeg2 , without all renames to avoid avoid conflicts with openjpeg-1.x , which is good . I just find documentation in devel-docs package which is correct . Maybe I call this sub-package as doc only, instead devel-doc but is not important, neither I'm sure that is the correct. Package APPROVED
Thanks, unretirement of openjpeg requested at https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12179
Since I acutally don't maintain the native openjpeg, I guess the proper way forward is for @trawets or @rdieter to update the package with this spec, resp add me as package admin if they're happy with me taking over.