Bug 2294400 - [MDR] left over PVC failed the failover without error
Summary: [MDR] left over PVC failed the failover without error
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: odf-dr
Version: 4.16
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Nir Soffer
QA Contact: krishnaram Karthick
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-06-26 15:00 UTC by dalia
Modified: 2024-09-16 13:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OCSBZM-8577 0 None None None 2024-09-16 13:27:55 UTC

Description dalia 2024-06-26 15:00:40 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
We had a leftover PVC on the scondry cluster due to this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291343

After applying the workaround, tried to failover the same application, but it didn't work, the PVC was there but the VM/pod were not.

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):
4.16

Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
No

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
yes, delete the PVC

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
3

Can this issue reproducible?
yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
yes

If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have a PVC on secondry cluster that match by name/namespace to the one on the primary
2. Failover primary cluster
3. Check if failover succeeded


Actual results: failover failed without any indication of why


Expected results: Some sort of error (resource already exist in the secondry cluster)


Additional info:

Comment 7 Sunil Kumar Acharya 2024-06-28 12:12:05 UTC
Moving the non-blocker BZ out of ODF-4.16.0. If this is a blocker feel free to propose it back with justification note.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.