Bug 229720 - LSPP: pfkey_spdget does not audit xrfm policy changes
Summary: LSPP: pfkey_spdget does not audit xrfm policy changes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Eric Paris
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: RHEL5LSPPCertTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-22 22:26 UTC by Eric Paris
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0959
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 19:41:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2007:0959 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Updated kernel packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Update 1 2007-11-08 00:47:37 UTC

Description Eric Paris 2007-02-22 22:26:09 UTC 
Just like the title says, pfkey_spdget does not audit xfrm policy changes.  An
audit hook needs to be added.
Comment 3 Eric Paris 2007-03-06 21:37:21 UTC 
This needs both verification from joy and upstream acceptance into a tree

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=117286158224756&w=2
Comment 4 Eric Paris 2007-03-23 17:47:06 UTC 
in at least 2.6.21-rc4 and verified by joy latten of ibm.  removing from LSPP
tracker list and ready for internal submission.
Comment 7 Don Zickus 2007-06-16 00:31:26 UTC 
in 2.6.18-27.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5
Comment 9 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-12 21:42:23 UTC 
confirmed fix is in the -46 kernel.
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 19:41:26 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0959.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.