Bug 2303829 - OCS Operator is not exposing the NamespacedName of the odfInfo configmap
Summary: OCS Operator is not exposing the NamespacedName of the odfInfo configmap
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.17
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ODF 4.17.0
Assignee: Racheli Aizik
QA Contact: Pratik Surve
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2302448
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-08-09 08:18 UTC by Rewant
Modified: 2025-02-28 04:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.17.0-69
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-10-30 14:30:36 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github red-hat-storage ocs-operator pull 2742 0 None open Bug 2303829: [[release-4.17] Reverts deprecated ClusterClaims for odf-info](https://github.com/red-hat-storage/ocs-opera... 2024-08-09 08:20:56 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OCSBZM-8855 0 None None None 2024-08-26 11:14:14 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2024:8676 0 None None None 2024-10-30 14:30:39 UTC

Description Rewant 2024-08-09 08:18:59 UTC
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippets):
OCS Operator needs to expose the namespaceName of the odfInfo configMap it created in order to make sure that the configMap can be fetched from the ACM Hub.


Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?


Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?


Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?


Can this issue reproducible?
Yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Sunil Kumar Acharya 2024-08-26 11:12:44 UTC
Please update the RDT flag/text appropriately.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2024-10-30 14:30:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.17.0 Security, Enhancement, & Bug Fix Update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8676

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2025-02-28 04:25:25 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.