Please branch and build latexmk in epel10 If you do not wish to maintain latexmk in epel10, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS rcallicotte); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/latexmk/adduser
Robby, I added you as a collaborator for the epel branches. Please coordinate with Ranjan, and let me know if I need to do anything on the Fedora side.
While I’m not the EPEL Bugzilla assignee, I’ve been taking care of EPEL9 updates for this packages for a while, and I’m happy to start taking care of EPEL10 too. On Matrix, Carl George wrote: > A general announcement about epel10 status (i.e. you can build now) is coming soon. We were doing real builds during the hackfest, and things mostly work, but I would like to get the repo published and mirrored before really opening the flood gates. So I don’t see an obvious reason not to build this particular package yet, and a scratch build in https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121750283 worked fine, but it’s worth noting that EPEL10 hasn’t been announced to the general population of Fedora developers yet (the last announcement[1] targeted November or December, and asked people not to start building packages just because they noticed infrastructure coming online), and things like configs for mock in mock-core-configs so people can do local mock builds are not ready yet. [1] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-status-update/124549
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3fb50215f7