Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Please branch and build latexmk in epel10 If you do not wish to maintain latexmk in epel10, or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner, I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS rcallicotte); please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/latexmk/adduser
Robby, I added you as a collaborator for the epel branches. Please coordinate with Ranjan, and let me know if I need to do anything on the Fedora side.
While I’m not the EPEL Bugzilla assignee, I’ve been taking care of EPEL9 updates for this packages for a while, and I’m happy to start taking care of EPEL10 too. On Matrix, Carl George wrote: > A general announcement about epel10 status (i.e. you can build now) is coming soon. We were doing real builds during the hackfest, and things mostly work, but I would like to get the repo published and mirrored before really opening the flood gates. So I don’t see an obvious reason not to build this particular package yet, and a scratch build in https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121750283 worked fine, but it’s worth noting that EPEL10 hasn’t been announced to the general population of Fedora developers yet (the last announcement[1] targeted November or December, and asked people not to start building packages just because they noticed infrastructure coming online), and things like configs for mock in mock-core-configs so people can do local mock builds are not ready yet. [1] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/epel-10-status-update/124549
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3fb50215f7